Calzone
Gear Whore #1
it varied from paper to paper but most of the medium to large size dailies had pool lenses in addition to kits. A kit would be a 24 or 28, a 50, an 85 or a 105. Pool lenses would be the ultra wides and the teles. The sports guys had totally different kits, of course. Not many papers issued kits that had high speed lenses. Papers could also borrow lenses from NPS for certain special purposes or events.
According to Moose Peterson the 180/2.8 was not only a very good lens (ED glass): it was favored by PJ's at press conferences due to its size, speed and reach.
I owned this lens and wide open it was sharp and it really isolated the subject very well. It worked very well hand held. It balanced particularly well on a F3 with MD-4.
Cal
ADDITION: On the Head Bartender's site there is an interview with a war photographer who used a pair of F3's. For his normal lens he favored the 55/2.8 AIS Macro. I currently own this lens and it is mighty sharp (flat field) and has pretty and smooth bokeh. Also close focus is great.
Cal
SECOND ADDITION: The 55/2.8 AIS Macro in use has a very-very long focus throw, but when used as a normal lens the infinity to 5-7 feet of focus is an extremely short focus throw. Also take not that for some reason the focus really pops. I can see why a war photographer would want a lens that focuses fast. While slow in lens speed the focus was fast.
Cal
Last edited: