Nikon Lens question

anitasanger

Well-known
Local time
7:00 PM
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
358
Okay, I'm very confused over digital camera lenses not equating to the focal length in certain situations? I know it has something to do with the censor size, but I really don't understand the science of it.

So, would this lens work as a 50mm lens on the new Nikon D7000? Or would it not really be 50mm? Thank you!

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-50mm-Ni...6?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1292367400&sr=1-6

There are many complicated ways to explain it. The simplified version is that on a Nikon DX camera (D90, D3000, D5000, D7000) it will behave pretty much like a 75mm lens (the rule of thumb is to multiply focal lengths with x1.5, it has to do with the sensor size compared to a traditional 35mm film frame). On a FX Nikon (D700, D3, D3s, D3x), with a sensor roughly the same size as 35mm film, it will behave pretty much as on film with a similar magnification and field of view.

Mac
 
Time was the 35mm camera was almost a standard. For years, a serious amateur would buy a 35mm SLR and a fixed focal length lens, say a 50mm lens. When the change came to digital, light-sensitive chips were very expensive to manufacture, and so these chips were usually made only a fraction of the size of a 35mm piece of film. For example, the original Canon Rebel, which had a light sensitive chip smaller than a 35mm piece of film was said to have a "crop factor" of 1.5. That is, to understand how much of the world could be recorded on that chip with your 50mm lens, you would have to multiply the lenses focal length by one-and-a-half times. 50 x 1.5 = 75. The lens hadn't changed, of course; only the size of the recording medium was smaller (kind of like you were exposing that 35mm piece of film and then trimming it down to the size of the chip). So, if the D7000 has a chip that is smaller than a 35mm piece of film, and a "crop factor" of greater than 1, you will have to multiply the focal length of your lens to get an approximation of your field of view with this camera. The 50mm lens has not changed, but the size of the recording medium has.

Clear enough? There is enough nuance in the optics of this to choke a cat (and you'll probably read some of that below). But in general, that's the deal.

Ben Marks
 
oh okay, thank you. That explains a lot! So basically unless I want a mini telephoto, I'll need to stick with 35mm? What a drag! I want a fast genreal purpose lens, at least 1.4. The only one I'm finding is the 50.
 
There are 35 f:1.4 lenses out there, but they tend to be expensive. It appears to be much more expensive to design a fast, wide-angle lens, than one that opens to f:2.8 or so.
 
oh okay, thank you. That explains a lot! So basically unless I want a mini telephoto, I'll need to stick with 35mm? What a drag! I want a fast genreal purpose lens, at least 1.4. The only one I'm finding is the 50.

There's the Nikon 35mm 1.8G, cheap good lens for crop sensor (APS-C/DX) cameras. It will not cover a full-frame sensor though. Surprisingly good optical quality and pretty much a classic "nifty fifty". I can warmly recommend it.

Mac
 
thank you also Benjamin for the very thorough explanation. They call the D7000's censor full size. So wouldn't that be 35mm? Oh the confusion.
 
There's two cameras with very similar names. D700 and D7000, Deeeseven 'hundred and 'thousand. The first one is a "full frame" (FX) with a similar sensor size to film, second one is a crop-sensor (DX) camera. The 35 1.8G is suitable for the latter one.

Optically the 35 1.8G is better than the older 35 2.0D (better edges and contrast). Not a very huge difference though. The 2.0 covers a full-frame sensor easily.

Mac
 
Anita, the 35mm F1.8 is great. Check out for faster the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM Autofocus lens for Nikon. People looove this lens but I've never tried one. It's $439 at B&H. The new Nikon 35mm F1.4 is like $2K or something extravagant like that. And huge. The crop factor makes the Sigma similar in view to a 45mm lens. Which some prefer to 50mm as it's closer to true "normal". But don't get started on what "normal" is. Save that for next week.
 
And, PS, with my DX sensor size Nikon D300 I use the AF Nikkor 24mm F2.8 and the AF Nikkor 50mm F 1.4 as my two carry around lenses these days: like walking around with an old film SLR, a 35mm and an 85mm lens. You're pretty much covered. I should use the 35mm F1.8 more: it's a great lens: but if I wan tto keep it to two, those are the two.
 
Back
Top Bottom