marcr1230
Well-known
I was poking around and saw a couple clean S2 bodies for $300-$350 (buy it now) on the bay
does that seem too low ?
does that seem too low ?
Nikon S2 Prices
- Thread starter marcr1230
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 8
- Views 1K
Chris Bail
Regular Guy
Prices are down at the moment. I've seen the same thing
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
I have noticed the same with the S3 combos... I was planning on selling my own S2 kit, but I think I'll wait instead.
css9450
Veteran
That price includes a lens, right? 🙂
I paid about double that figure, but that was back in 2007.
I paid about double that figure, but that was back in 2007.
marcr1230
Well-known
The $300 price is just the body
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Wonderful camera. Time to buy. If you already have one; seems perverse to sell it at twice that price. Maybe perverse too strong a word, but, really, a nice S2 is a lot of love for $300.
B-9
Devin Bro
Sold mine recently for 195$ body only, really rough user but in good operating order.
My first S2 cost me 400$ in 2014 in excellent condition. Both without lens.
I think prices are a little low right now for sellers, but still catching more than their Contax cousins. So all in all, a good thing as they are more approachable at the current prices for those wanting to try Nikon RF.
I wish the glass would take a little price slash! 😉
My first S2 cost me 400$ in 2014 in excellent condition. Both without lens.
I think prices are a little low right now for sellers, but still catching more than their Contax cousins. So all in all, a good thing as they are more approachable at the current prices for those wanting to try Nikon RF.
I wish the glass would take a little price slash! 😉
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
One can always use the excellent Helios 103 that can be bought for 30 dollars and give it the easy Brian S. mod.
kuzano
Veteran
Nikon prices????
Nikon prices????
I've always been fascinated that when Nikon copied the Contax II (or Kiev) rangefinders, they were able to cut the base leg of the rangefinder triangle in half and get more money for the camera because of the Nikon Name?
Why is that?I loved the way my 1952 Kiev would focus a 90mm lens, while the Nikon had problems getting spot on.
Nikon prices????
I've always been fascinated that when Nikon copied the Contax II (or Kiev) rangefinders, they were able to cut the base leg of the rangefinder triangle in half and get more money for the camera because of the Nikon Name?
Why is that?I loved the way my 1952 Kiev would focus a 90mm lens, while the Nikon had problems getting spot on.
