BillBingham2
Registered User
It's sad from the perspective of chasing the all might lowest cost of production and how it helps lay waste to the middle class (did it amazingly well here in the US) in the country where companies where built from initially.
On a side note it's interesting how Nikon pendulum swung wildly in an effort to find a Mirror-less home run. The 1 was small, priced right, limited, but had great point that often overshined some of the bad. IMHO, they pulled a Kodak and didn't get behind it (e.g. never saw enough prime glass), though body-wise they seemed to keep up with the Jones well. Then they go all in on the Z series with glass that reminds me of Pentax 67 in size, initially missing what many of us love about mirrorless (smaller size).
B2 (;->
On a side note it's interesting how Nikon pendulum swung wildly in an effort to find a Mirror-less home run. The 1 was small, priced right, limited, but had great point that often overshined some of the bad. IMHO, they pulled a Kodak and didn't get behind it (e.g. never saw enough prime glass), though body-wise they seemed to keep up with the Jones well. Then they go all in on the Z series with glass that reminds me of Pentax 67 in size, initially missing what many of us love about mirrorless (smaller size).
B2 (;->