rodneyAB
Established
Here's another example of Plus-X:
![]()
regardless of film etc...this is a wonderful photo...beautiful subject
Here's another example of Plus-X:
![]()
Chris--those last two examples of PX are gorgeous. The photo of your grandfather has a warmer tone than the cat photo; is this due to post-processing, or are the negs different?
regardless of film etc...this is a wonderful photo...beautiful subject
What puts me off is the cost of it. Where I am it's more expensive than Tri-x and costs nearly twice as much as Acros 100.
John
It's like that here (in the U.S.) as well. It's almost $70/100 ft. roll at Freestyle ($15 more than the next most expensive 100 ft offering). I'd like to know why Kodak charges so much more. Maybe it's the extra silver content? 😛/
Why not just buy Arista Premium 100? it's one of the cheapest B&W films on the market.
Marty
Well, we're discussing Plus-X film, not the 'cheapest' film. I know I can get cheaper film. Cost (while important) is not the determining factor for me with regard to which films I like or shoot. I think I'm like a lot of photographers. We shoot certain films, because of the look and because we know the film. I know PX, and I like the look of it. While I might have to stop shooting it because of the cost (it is at a bit of a premium), this ISO range (as someone else stated) is crowded with some very good films (most reasonably priced)—for example, I'm very fond of Acros and I still have 200' of APX (which is magical stuff).
Having said that, the price of Arista 100 (which I've not used) makes it enticing to 'get to so know'. 🙂
Arista Premium IS plus-x. There's no question it is, the film is American Made, has the same dev times as Plus-X and there were even a couple of chemists on APUG who tested the emulsion scientifically and determined it was chemically identical to plus-x. Arista Premium 400 is Tri-X and was verified the same way. I've shot a ton of the 400 side by side with Tri-X and they're identical in every way except the Arista is less than half what kodak-branded Tri-X costs. Same goes for the Arista. You might as well save money, or use the savings to get more film. I buy the 400 60 rolls at a time. I couldn't afford that with Tri-X.
Arista Premium IS plus-x. There's no question it is, the film is American Made, has the same dev times as Plus-X and there were even a couple of chemists on APUG who tested the emulsion scientifically and determined it was chemically identical to plus-x. Arista Premium 400 is Tri-X and was verified the same way. I've shot a ton of the 400 side by side with Tri-X and they're identical in every way except the Arista is less than half what kodak-branded Tri-X costs. Same goes for the Arista. You might as well save money, or use the savings to get more film. I buy the 400 60 rolls at a time. I couldn't afford that with Tri-X.


Another B&W 100 film I liked a lot is Ilford Pan 100, but I can't seem to find any, I think it's discontinued. I'll try to find some locally. I have a few pictures taken on Pan 100 in my Flickr and my RFF gallery.
I still have a 400ft can of 5231- kodak's movie version of +X. Of course, they stopped te production of this emulsion last year - so now I have to "ration" its use!