Stewart is almost certainly correct -- he is not given to making such categorical statements without checking first -- but I have found the 50/1.5 marginal at less than 2 metres with the smaller magnification finder (R2 series) and I'd suspect that the 50/1.1 would be about equally marginal with the 1.0x. After all,the mechanical accuracy (base length) is not improved: only the effective accuracy (effective base length).
By 'marginal' I mean that while it's possible to focus slowly and carefully, as long as you have excellent eyesight (corrected if necessary), when you're working quickly there may be times when you're pushing your luck.
In other words, it'll almost always work, but not infallibly. Though I suppose that's true of most manual focusing systems. It's even more true of autofocus!
Tashi delek,
R.