Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Of course you are right ... real world work is where things matter. I was just thinking about the absolute capabilities of the lenses since the comparison to Leica glass was made. Since with M glass, at least, you don't have mirror slap and vibration to contend with, it only seemed fair. And I AM going to shoot with the 21/2 on the OM-1n with mirror locked up, RF style. I'll stick a Leitz 21mm finder on Shoe 4 (yes, it has a hairline crack!) and shoot away at 1/4 ~1/8 sec, maybe faster if I'm lucky.Tom Diaz said:I found the tests with mirror up useful for comparing OM mount lenses with each other, for use on an OM. However, it seems like the right comparison between any SLR and any RF should include the SLR mirror banging around in there! That's fair, isn't it? (If we pursue this notion we might subtly get this thread back on topic, eh?)
BTW, the crawling on the belly reference brings back memories to me, too. Thank goodness I have the Varimagni finder!
My favourite body remains the OM-1 rather than the OM-2 because of mirror lock-up. (It could be the OM-3 or OM-4 if I'd actually owned one.) For the life of me, I can't figure out why mirror lock-up was omitted on the OM-2.
Last edited: