Oh my! (new videos) and sample images!

All the images are incredibly boring, yes, but they look fantastic technically. I was worried about corner softness from some of those norwegian samples, but this looks great from corner to corner. I took the photo of the tall building on blue sky with snow on it and green window frames, and none of the snow is blown, despite looking white. I was able to bring it back with good contrast with the shadow/highlight tool.

One thing I'm dissapointed with is no high iso samples yet. There was one at iso 400, but all others are at base iso of 200.
 
videogamemaker said:
All the images are incredibly boring, yes, but they look fantastic technically. I was worried about corner softness from some of those norwegian samples, but this looks great from corner to corner. I took the photo of the tall building on blue sky with snow on it and green window frames, and none of the snow is blown, despite looking white. I was able to bring it back with good contrast with the shadow/highlight tool.

One thing I'm dissapointed with is no high iso samples yet. There was one at iso 400, but all others are at base iso of 200.
Click to expand...

Agree with everything you've said. Yes the samples are boring as hell, and flat as hell. The camera obviously has HEAPS of DR and highlight headroom as there are basically no clipped highlights in these samples. I took each shot into photoshop, upped the contrast with curves, upped the saturation and sharpened them, and the tones/colors/graduations and detail are all comparable to my 5d. The lens looks sharp and the colors are accurate.

Stoked!
 
BMacW said:
He obviously knows the Fuji marketing lady Kayce. So I take it as a sign that Fuji is ready to unleash this baby for a slightly bigger masses for testing/reviewing.

Steve Huff says he might get one soon as well.

This makes the waiting bit a lot more tolerable.
Click to expand...

Now I feel like a real wise ass :D
 
ElectroWNED said:
those sample pictures of the bike and telephone look like something coming out of an iPhone
Click to expand...

So, you're saying that's a good thing, right? Because the iPhone is selling like -- hotcakes! If Fuji sold as many X100s as iPhones, that'd make it a best-selling camera.

I'd also say that any camera that can be used as conveniently as a cell-phone camera makes it a good candidate for street photography, so again your comparison is an unintended compliment. ;)

~Joe
 
Looking at the update to the Fuji site that has an image sample gallery where you can download the full-size files w/ EXIF data, things look pretty promising.
 
JoeV said:
So, you're saying that's a good thing, right? Because the iPhone is selling like -- hotcakes! If Fuji sold as many X100s as iPhones, that'd make it a best-selling camera.

I'd also say that any camera that can be used as conveniently as a cell-phone camera makes it a good candidate for street photography, so again your comparison is an unintended compliment. ;)

~Joe
Click to expand...

I'll keep my $20 XA and $9 a month slider phone, thanks :)
 
ElectroWNED said:
I'll keep my $20 XA and $9 a month slider phone, thanks :)
Click to expand...
Hehe, I was thinking the same thing especially after viewing the files from the X100. I mean, c'mon it was NEVER, ever going to live up to the extreme hype was it? :D

The shots don't even come close to something like a Lumix GF1 which can be had used for almost 1/3 of the X100's UK price and the GF1 is several years old to boot. Sure the X100 looks great, retro and all that but if you want a decent retro looking camera go buy a Rollei 35 for £50 I reckon.
 
Actually, the sample shots I've seen so far have reminded me a lot of the RFF gallery. I think they'd fit right in.
 
videogamemaker said:
We have to wait and see, since only jpegs have been released so far, and who knows how much sharpening they have applied ...
Click to expand...
No sharpening applied to the few images I've looked at.

A full exif reader is useful. :)


[PhotoME]
PhotoME version: 0.79R17 (Build 856)

[Overview]
File name: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris\Desktop\DSCF1580.JPG
File type: JPEG
File size: 4,839.4*KB
Creation date: 22/01/2011 12:25
Last modification: 9/02/2011 22:05
Make: FUJIFILM (http://www.fujifilm.com)
Camera: FinePix X100
Software: Digital Camera FinePix X100 Ver0.56
Dimension: 4288 x 2848*px*(12.2 MP, 3:2)
Focal length: 23*mm
Aperture: f/16
Exposure time: 1/34" (+0.33*EV)
ISO speed rating: 200/24°
Program: Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode: Pattern
White Balance: Auto
Focus Mode: Auto
Noise Reduction: 256
Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode

[Image]
Manufacturer: FUJIFILM
Image input equipment model: FinePix X100
Orientation of image: 90° CW (left/bottom)
Image resolution in width direction: 72*dpi
Image resolution in height direction: 72*dpi
Unit of X and Y resolution: inch
Software: Digital Camera FinePix X100 Ver0.56
File change date and time: 2011-01-22 12:25:36
Y and C positioning: Co-Sited
Copyright holder:
Exif IFD Pointer: 0x0000016E
PRINT Image Matching: 0x00000104

[Thumbnail Info]
Compression scheme: JPEG (old-style)
Orientation of image: 90° CCW (right/top)
Image resolution in width direction: 72*dpi
Image resolution in height direction: 72*dpi
Unit of X and Y resolution: inch
Offset to JPEG SOI: 0x00000700
Bytes of JPEG data: 10862*bytes
Y and C positioning: Co-Sited

[Camera]
Exposure time: 1/34"
F number: f/16
Exposure program: Aperture priority
ISO speed rating: 200/24°
??? (8830): 1
Exif version: Version 2.3
Date and time of original data generation: 2011-01-22 12:25:36
Date and time of digital data generation: 2011-01-22 12:25:36
Meaning of each component: YCbCr
Image compression mode: 3.2*bpp
Shutter speed: 5.11*Tv (1/34.5")
Aperture: 8*Av (f/16)
Brightness: 7.34 (162*fL)
Exposure bias: +0.33*EV
Maximum lens aperture: 2*Av (f/2)
Metering mode: Pattern
Light source: Unknown
Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
Lens focal length: 23*mm
Manufacturer notes: 0x000003A0
Supported Flashpix version: Version 1.0
Color space: sRGB
Image width: 4288*px
Image height: 2848*px
Interoperability IFD Pointer: 0x0000066C
Focal plane X resolution: 1821*ppcm
Focal plane Y resolution: 1821*ppcm
Focal plane resolution unit: cm
Sensing method: One-chip color area sensor
File source: Digital Camera
Scene type: A directly photographed image
Custom image processing: Custom process
Exposure mode: Auto exposure
White balance: Auto
Scene capture type: Standard
Sharpness: Normal
Subject distance range: Unknown

[Manufacturer notes]
Version: 1.3.0
Internal Serial Number: FPX 25000037 592D36323232101217E35020110120
Manufacture Date: 2010-12-17
Quality: Fine
Sharpness: Normal
White Balance: Auto
Saturation: 769
White Balance Fine Tune: Red: ±0, Blue: ±0
Noise Reduction: 256
??? (100E): 0
Flash Mode: Off
Flash Exposure Compensation: 0
Macro: Off
Focus Mode: Auto
??? (1022): 1
Focus Pixel: x = 2144, y = 1424
??? (1026): 64
Slow Sync: Off
Picture Mode: Aperture-priority AE
??? (1032): 1
??? (1040): 0
??? (1041): 0
Auto Bracketing: Off
Sequence Number: 0
??? (1200): 0
Blur Warning: None
Focus Warning: Good
Exposure Warning: Good
??? (1303): 0
??? (1304): 0
??? (1305): 0
Dynamic Range: Standard
Dynamic Range Setting: RAW
Development Dynamic Range: 100
??? (1408): 2.0.0
??? (1409): 1.0.0
??? (140A): 3
??? (1431): 0
??? (4100): 0
??? (4200): 0

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Identification: R98: DCF basic file (sRGB)
Interoperability Version: Version 1.0

[PRINT Image Matching]
PrintIM Version: Version 2.5
??? (0002): 0x00000001
??? (0003): 0x00000022
??? (0101): 0x00000000
 
Last edited:
Tom, I'm just reading the exif data in the full-size jpegs I've downloaded. I thought they looked a little soft, like the unsharpened jpegs from my Pentax dSLR.
 
I have checked out the sample images on the official X100 website and must, although reluctantly, agree with KR - the images are very soft and low contrast. Maybe Fuji is trying to sell the smoothness & bokeh, but 12 Mpix images at low ISO from APS-C sensor should really be clean, smooth and crisp at the same time ... or so I would expect.

Indeed - we need to see some "true life" performance before doing too much judgement. Still - to keep up with the rest of the X100 webpage I think Fuji should provide better quality (technical & content & composition wise). The BW photos are really flat and lifeless. It is easy to get smooth tones with ultra low contrast images.

C'mon Fuji - show us what this camera can really do!
 
Matus said:
I have checked out the sample images on the official X100 website and must, although reluctantly, agree with KR - the images are very soft and low contrast. Maybe Fuji is trying to sell the smoothness & bokeh, but 12 Mpix images at low ISO from APS-C sensor should really be clean, smooth and crisp at the same time ... or so I would expect.

Indeed - we need to see some "true life" performance before doing too much judgement. Still - to keep up with the rest of the X100 webpage I think Fuji should provide better quality (technical & content & composition wise). The BW photos are really flat and lifeless. It is easy to get smooth tones with ultra low contrast images.

C'mon Fuji - show us what this camera can really do!
Click to expand...

Maybe they already have shown what it *really* can do? :(
 
ChrisN said:
Actually, the sample shots I've seen so far have reminded me a lot of the RFF gallery. I think they'd fit right in.
Click to expand...

MargaretCho.jpg
 
cidereye said:
The shots don't even come close to something like a Lumix GF1 which can be had used for almost 1/3 of the X100's UK price and the GF1 is several years old to boot. Sure the X100 looks great, retro and all that but if you want a decent retro looking camera go buy a Rollei 35 for £50 I reckon.
Click to expand...

Wow, a few lame shots on a company website and you jumped to that conclusion>? :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom