Ohio Cop Shoots Photog, mistaking Camera for Gun

Beemermark said:
Law Enforcement officers are trained, but for really small towns the training, the pay and the job interviews are sorely lacking. My family are in law enforcement at the federal level and I interface with the local city police, sheriff and Highway Patrol. In my county they are top notch.

Unfortunately shooting a white male gets little media attention. many LEO officers are poorly trained. If a Black person gets shot it's national news for a month. White or other minorities are not news.

Police officers in this case are just either poorly trained or do not have the mental capacity for the job. Unfortunately if it isn't considered poor training then it must be racism.
Click to expand...

I'm in a big city where our past mayor proclaimed that anyone getting into the Police Academy will pass and become an officer. This has caused many older cops to retire early. They don't want to partner with these new cops, they are afraid of them. One Sargent told me that the new Psych. Exam would allow people who wouldn't qualify as security guards to become city cops now. She sold her home and moved her family out of the city.
 
poor training, over-militarized, lack of desire to "serve and protect", us versus them mentality, hyped and inaccurate messages that crime is worse than it is, pandering law makers.

it's a tough job, and probably one quarter of the people doing it are unqualified, regardless of their training.
 
I worked in emergency response services for years and knew a great many police officers. Thank goodness the great majority were level headed men and women who were not subject to nervous jitters and unnecessary fright.

Unfortunately recruiting now days has been more difficult and the quality of law enforcement personnel is not as high as it once was. Some are scared to death to do their job. On the other side of the spectrum you have a power hungry elite who believe they can do no wrong once they put on a badge. These officers can't do the job right because they have the wrong temperament.

Police are a necessary evil within society, but that does not mean we have to overlook the potentially serious problems involved in allowing a small group of armed men and women to control other's actions. Power corrupts and that affects police forces very quickly if not properly controlled. Instead the police must be very closely supervised and they should clearly understand that their role is to serve and protect the people who pay their salaries, not beat and shoot them.

The idea that law enforcement officers have a tough job so should be given the benefit of the doubt is pure BS. For me the minute they pull their weapon they better be able to justify why they decided that was needed, especially so if they fire that weapon. Of course it doesn't have to be a gun. A club can also be a terrible weapon as well. This response is critical if we are to learn how to avoid the issue in the future.

Funny thing about training, most police officers seem to be able to remember their training on how to use a pistol or a baton. They are very eager to attend practice sessions in the use of these weapons. Unfortunately it is the training on how to defuse potentially dangerous situations that they seem to forget. And trying to get them into role playing training on applying these techniques, or getting them to actually participate in class, is very difficult. If you don't believe this is true, spend a little time auditing this training. Auditing these classes is almost always allowed, but very, very few people ever do it. Of course doing so can be a real eye opener, and may alter your opinion of some of the people who are allowed to be police officers in your own community.

A police state should be feared. When police use their power outside of their mandate, and the people overseeing them fail to stop that abuse of power, then you have a police state. That is what is happening in some parts of the US and it takes strong men and women to put an end to it. Not people who feel sorry for the "tough" job the police officer is faced with. Unfortunately in some communities it is going to take a very long time for people to trust those people who are there to "protect" them.
 
Last edited:
...Deputy Jake Shaw should be fired.

Contrary to his statement, he was not doing his job. Not unless the Miami Valley Police Dept considers shooting bystanders to be part of the job that they want their police officers to do.

How do you actually rationalize shooting a bystander with a camera??? And which boss is going to let you get away with rationalizing it???

Furthermore, everyone who knows this guy should run the minute they seem him with a gun. I for one do not want him to be anywhere near me while carrying a gun. He is a menace to those around him whether he consciously considers himself to be one or not.
 
I find it all quite baffling.

Here in the United States, last week a cop in Ohio sees someone with something that the cop thinks might be a gun, and shoots the person. Yet a few weeks ago in Charlottesville, cops saw many people with very real assault rifles, menacing other people, and did nothing.

I don't get it.

Best,
-Tim
 
Timmyjoe said:
I find it all quite baffling.

Here in the United States, last week a cop in Ohio sees someone with something that the cop thinks might be a gun, and shoots the person. Yet a few weeks ago in Charlottesville, cops saw many people with very real assault rifles, menacing other people, and did nothing.

I don't get it.

Best,
-Tim
Click to expand...

A police officer firing a shot during the demonstrations in South Carolina would certainly have created a blood bath that someone would have had to answer for. Nobody wants that so the people in charge in South Carolina kept their people under very strict control.

As stupid as the situation in Ohio was, it did not even come close to the potential for violence in South Carolina.

I think that the police in Charlottsville did a great job. Some of the idiots who were brandishing their rifles in the crowd can be tracked down, charged and arrested after the excitement has passed. If in fact they really did anything wrong. It is not against the law for me to carry my rifle in public where I live, even in the middle of a protest, so the police would need to prove I was doing something illegal first. It might not be really intelligent since accidents can happen, but carrying the rifle is not a crime.

Now if you use that rifle to threaten someone else then you would have al problem. But they still have to prove it in court. Right or wrong that might not be too easy to do in South Carolina right now.
 
bayernfan said:
i find myself in the "don't give a cop the slightest reason to shoot you" camp. a potentially awesome picture is not worth losing your life. be smart.
Click to expand...

Really? I suppose some of us should just whitewash our skin and start wearing swastikas or either never go to places like minnesota or texas.. "don't give a cop the slightest reason to shoot you" what a thing to say.
 
Pioneer said:
A police officer firing a shot during the demonstrations in South Carolina would certainly have created a blood bath that someone would have had to answer for. Nobody wants that so the people in charge in South Carolina kept their people under very strict control.

As stupid as the situation in Ohio was, it did not even come close to the potential for violence in South Carolina.

I think that the police in Charlottsville did a great job. Some of the idiots who were brandishing their rifles in the crowd can be tracked down, charged and arrested after the excitement has passed. If in fact they really did anything wrong. It is not against the law for me to carry my rifle in public where I live, even in the middle of a protest, so the police would need to prove I was doing something illegal first. It might not be really intelligent since accidents can happen, but carrying the rifle is not a crime.

Now if you use that rifle to threaten someone else then you would have al problem. But they still have to prove it in court. Right or wrong that might not be too easy to do in South Carolina right now.
Click to expand...

Well, Charlottesville is in Virginia, so I'm not sure you're talking about the same situation I am. Not sure what happened in South Carolina. But even in states with open carry, you cannot menace someone with your firearm. There are multiple cases of menacing that happened in Charlottesville, many caught on camera. Yet the police did nothing.

Best,
-Tim
 
With guns so prevalent in the U.S., police probably assume everyone they encounter can endanger them and they aren't taking any chances - guilty until proven innocent?
 
bayernfan said:
i find myself in the "don't give a cop the slightest reason to shoot you" camp. a potentially awesome picture is not worth losing your life. be smart.
Click to expand...

Does not work. Never leave your house (and make sure someone else answers the door for you) may work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dorner_shootings_and_manhunt

In the Dorner manhunt, the cops gunned at two Hispanic ladies delivering newspapers, and a white surfer dood driving his pick up down the freeway. In broad daylight.

The only way something will change is if the cops are made liable. Right now tax payers are liable. They shoot someone, taxpayers pay the settlement. Not the cops. Not the police force. But us.
 
mwoenv said:
With guns so prevalent in the U.S., police probably assume everyone they encounter can endanger them and they aren't taking any chances - guilty until proven innocent?
Click to expand...

If a U.S. citizen were to do the exact thing the police officer in Ohio did - shoot first, ask questions later - and had shot a guy with a camera and a tripod, the citizen would be arrested, crucified in court and spend decades in prison.

Since we supposedly have the principle of equal treatment under the law here in the U.S., why does this police officer not face the same treatment that a non-police officer citizen would face?

Where is the equal treatment under the law in the Ohio shooting??
 
bayernfan said:
i find myself in the "don't give a cop the slightest reason to shoot you" camp. a potentially awesome picture is not worth losing your life. be smart.
Click to expand...

Yes, the photographer in question certainly had it coming - how dare he walk down the sidewalk with a camera and a tripod, for God's sake??

He should do what I did: I sold my cameras, lenses and tripod then donated the proceeds to the police officer's benevolent association. Nowadays I hide under my bed reading photography magazines, fantasizing about taking pictures. It's the only way to truly be safe from being shot by a scared and negligent police officer. :rolleyes:
 
Pioneer said:
...Deputy Jake Shaw should be fired.

Contrary to his statement, he was not doing his job. Not unless the Miami Valley Police Dept considers shooting bystanders to be part of the job that they want their police officers to do.
Click to expand...

+1 and what you said in the previous post



Pioneer said:
How do you actually rationalize shooting a bystander with a camera??? And which boss is going to let you get away with rationalizing it???
...
Click to expand...

It's the "Stand Your Ground" mentality that has created the fear-driven response of pull-the-glock. Shoot first, ask questions later and remember, you were afraid for your life when you pulled the trigger.

The power-hungry have always seem to become or want to become LEOs. They used to wash out, it seems not so much these days. Our State Troupers here are down over 100 folks for field duty. Many of the inside people who were there for the benefits are leaving (the protection via the union was stripped away last legislative session). They can get more money and much better benefits elsewhere.

B2 (;->
 
noisycheese said:
If a U.S. citizen were to do the exact thing the police officer in Ohio did - shoot first, ask questions later - and had shot a guy with a camera and a tripod, the citizen would be arrested, crucified in court and spend decades in prison.

Since we supposedly have the principle of equal treatment under the law here in the U.S., why does this police officer not face the same treatment that a non-police officer citizen would face?

Where is the equal treatment under the law in the Ohio shooting??
Click to expand...

There is some accountability for the individual police officer if it can be proven that he or she stepped WAY outside their rights and duties.

Unfortunately in most circumstances, the District Attorney who would prosecute that officer is unwilling to move forward lest the remaining police officers make his job miserable beyond belief. It takes a massive amount of external political pressure to bring some of these police to justice. Of course, good men sometimes get caught in these dragnets as well since political pressure of this type may not be able to really differentiate between the good and the bad.

The "Blue Wall" is so named for a good reason. No active police officer wants to be the one who offers evidence or testimony that puts a fellow officer behind bars.

It is also for this reason that corruption can run rampant within police departments for so long without being stopped. Good men will remain silent because they are afraid of what can be done to them as well. Things as simple as failing to back up a fellow officer who is under threat can make their jobs almost impossible to do.

To say nothing of the power of the police unions in certain metropolitan areas.
 
Timmyjoe said:
Well, Charlottesville is in Virginia, so I'm not sure you're talking about the same situation I am. Not sure what happened in South Carolina...
Best,
-Tim
Click to expand...

Sorry Tiim. South Carolina was certainly an error. Thanks for correcting that.
 
Huss said:
Does not work. Never leave your house (and make sure someone else answers the door for you) may work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dorner_shootings_and_manhunt

In the Dorner manhunt, the cops gunned at two Hispanic ladies delivering newspapers, and a white surfer dood driving his pick up down the freeway. In broad daylight.

The only way something will change is if the cops are made liable. Right now tax payers are liable. They shoot someone, taxpayers pay the settlement. Not the cops. Not the police force. But us.
Click to expand...

+1 on this. Make them liable
 
Poor training is not an excuse,

Do we let poorly trained architects design public buildings... (I'm sure there are a few instances)

Do we let poorly trained hi-low operators on OSHA jobs? Never.
 
Would it be in bad taste to suggest that this thread could be subsumed by another thread appearing on this forum - "Shooting the shooter"? Probably it would. Sorry I have a sick sense of humor.

Seriously I hope he is OK.

While this incident does seem to say something about poor police training perhaps it also says something about the state of affairs in the USA where after years of "Black Lives Matter" (some members of which advocated murdering police officers) and even more years of terrorism it is to be expected that police officers (who don't forget are also human) might be on edge and in fear of their own lives. This in no way condones what he did but I also have at least some sympathy for that guy too - whose live is now also altered unchangeably. We should remember it was a tragic mistake not a premeditated act.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom