valdas
Veteran
So you see - you admit (by the way of your logic) that there is no consistency. Should it be taxed based on value or based on price (becasue those not always equal)? If based on price - I pay zero for traded item (and should not be taxed). If it is based on value, not price, then items should be fairly re-evaluated for taxation purposed regardless of what was paid for them in "lottery" type of autions (wow, look, I only paid 600 for this mint M6).
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
I want one of those!
ellisson
Well-known
Its not that complicated. Declaration value is the price the item sold for.
People can debate value till hell freezes over. They cannot debate the actual selling price. Its that easy!
People can debate value till hell freezes over. They cannot debate the actual selling price. Its that easy!
FujiLove
Well-known
I buy a 50 year old camera from a guy next door and the government doesn't ask me for a penny.
I buy a 50 year old camera from a guy two thousand miles away in another European country and the government doesn't ask me for a penny.
I buy a 50 year old camera from a guy in the US and the government asks me to pay them 26% of it's value.
It seems like an unfair tax in this day and age of international trade. Unfair taxes tend to generate resentment and encourage people to cheat. It's not the sellers fault in any way. I say, don't write to sellers asking them to act illegally, write to your government and ask them to stop applying unfair taxes to their citizens.
I buy a 50 year old camera from a guy two thousand miles away in another European country and the government doesn't ask me for a penny.
I buy a 50 year old camera from a guy in the US and the government asks me to pay them 26% of it's value.
It seems like an unfair tax in this day and age of international trade. Unfair taxes tend to generate resentment and encourage people to cheat. It's not the sellers fault in any way. I say, don't write to sellers asking them to act illegally, write to your government and ask them to stop applying unfair taxes to their citizens.
Nigel Meaby
Well-known
When shipping items from the UK the insured value and customs declared value are not the same thing. You pay, for example, the post office to have the item insured up to "x" amount and can then write a completely different customs value on the declaration sticker. On occasions, my local Post Office clerk has actively encouraged me to write a lower customs value!
If however the item is lost in transit to make a claim you need to provide proof of purchase and price paid. If you're selling an item you've previously yourself bought second hand from a private seller and didn't receive a written receipt, you're pretty screwed when it comes to making a claim.
If however the item is lost in transit to make a claim you need to provide proof of purchase and price paid. If you're selling an item you've previously yourself bought second hand from a private seller and didn't receive a written receipt, you're pretty screwed when it comes to making a claim.
ellisson
Well-known
Agree, you should not declare a price lower than what the item sold for. I just sold a lens hood for $90, and if I were shipping it outside the US and had to declare its value, I would state $90, the actual price it sold for.
I paid $130 for that hood 6 years ago. Its value - debatable. But it would not be "low balling" to declare the price it was sold at NOW.
I paid $130 for that hood 6 years ago. Its value - debatable. But it would not be "low balling" to declare the price it was sold at NOW.
Lss
Well-known
Firstly, I have never asked a seller to undervalue an item in any form. If you wish not to undervalue, don't.
But I am still no fan of paying extra customs and taxes on things I buy. Let's say I buy an item for $100 with $30 shipping. (A US customer gets the same for perhaps $100 + $5 or even $100 in total.) I then pay customs and taxes on the total, and it all adds up quickly. So, it is perhaps $130 + 8% after customs. My government naturally wants to protect the home market, where there is no substitute product thus forcing me to shop online. Makes sense, right? And it makes sense that I pay customs for shipping, too, because it could have been done by a local guy flying back and forth instead of an evil international corporation doing it more efficiently I guess. As value has also been added, I'd then better pay some VAT to top it off. So, now we are at $140,4 + 24%. (See what they did there? They had me even pay tax on customs for shipping!) That's $174,10 out of my pocket in total to buy a $100 item that I cannot get locally. My government made $44,10 out of nothing in the process. Which would be great unless it was 100% my money on which I have already paid some 1/3 in income tax to begin with. In other words, I had to work for about $70 just in order to pay the part of the pie my government wants for their money grabber role in this transaction. That's on top of the about $200 I had to earn to pay for the initial purchase and the shipping. So, I am no fan.
valdas
Veteran
Well, I made the trade, the price I paid is zero. But I am taxed. That's my issue.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
So, you don't want to contribute to the healthcare and educational system in your country?
I'm with Dante all the way.
I'm not surpised you are with him and making fasle assumtion abouts me.
I'm paying 60$K in taxes from 100K$ annual income.
The problem here is not with paying of taxes as you could see from my numbers.
Healthcare in Ontario is on costant decline even after additional tax was imposed on us and services are consantly getting delisted with more taxes collected. The problem with healthcare is in the elected by idiots goverment which first name is corrumtion and second name is missppending.
Billions of dollars are stolen from Ontraio health care. Proven facts.
Same situation is with schools. We have portables at freshly build schools and falling appart old schools, dangeriossly falling apart. Yet, schoolboards organisations like in Toronto misspending millions of dollars ever year. Also proven facts.
But, yes, for you and him it is easy to blame Canadains for not paying taxes. You give no sh..t how we feel and what is local situation in terms of spending of collected taxes, it is all about how you feel. Very american.
bluesun267
Well-known
Agreed, I've had that experience too. It's not about cheating taxes but avoiding thieving postal workers in some countries.
skibeerr
Well-known
A friend back in Antwerp works for COSCO. When his Chinese boss went to Hong Kong for a business trip he bought a Rolex.
He did not want to pay import taxes and vat so he decided to slip the watch on his wrist and send the box and papers home ( Antwerp) by post.
The box got checked by customs when it came in to Belgium and by the time he got back he was singled out by customs at the airport.
He was really unlucky because Belgian customs can/could not cope with the influx of parcels and my personal score is I had to pay on one in ten.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Corruption and huge misspending at Toronto school boards is matter of proven facts, but many like you prefer not to know about it.
Shame on you.
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
Exactly as Lasse describes above.
I follow the law, the rules, but sometimes it gets very frustrating.
I made a great deal with EXPIRED film from an US ebay seller, 150$ paid to him. Ended up paying some 35% of a combination of import duty + VAT+ the "service" of the post office for arranging my duty papers (which they are obliged to do so they don't even bother me with the details, i only get the bill...), indeed on the NEW FULL FRESH FILM price one would pay in a Dutch shop, minus the 21% VAT.
So i ended up paying considerably MORE than buying local fresh film, even tho i bought EXPIRED film. In what logic is this not a *** situation?
This was clearly based on "value" as they thought of, and not on what I payed the seller.
However,
Different story but with same results happened with a 70 y old book. I payed 75$ to the seller, +i payed almost 30$ as tax "services" (and i am supposed to even feel lucky, since books have lower VAT than some "luxury" goods such as film). It was even marked as old, collectible. Obviously, in this case they gave no **** about "real" value (newest edition of the book would cost some 10-15$), in this case they thought it's a good idea to tax the selling price. And the shipping, of course
I mean i understand high value items should not be smuggled in, but where on earth is it worthy even to hassle administration and all, to tax a single 75$ valued old book?
PS, I never ask the seller to undervalue the goods on the form. Once i asked to mark it clearly collectible, just in case. Didn't help.
However in the very beginning of me buying stuff on ebay, a quite reputable seller offered (without me asking) to mark the item as gift) Yes the seller is also on RFF (inactive). I was rather surprised. It was a 30 bucks fixed lens rf only, though.
I follow the law, the rules, but sometimes it gets very frustrating.
I made a great deal with EXPIRED film from an US ebay seller, 150$ paid to him. Ended up paying some 35% of a combination of import duty + VAT+ the "service" of the post office for arranging my duty papers (which they are obliged to do so they don't even bother me with the details, i only get the bill...), indeed on the NEW FULL FRESH FILM price one would pay in a Dutch shop, minus the 21% VAT.
So i ended up paying considerably MORE than buying local fresh film, even tho i bought EXPIRED film. In what logic is this not a *** situation?
This was clearly based on "value" as they thought of, and not on what I payed the seller.
However,
Different story but with same results happened with a 70 y old book. I payed 75$ to the seller, +i payed almost 30$ as tax "services" (and i am supposed to even feel lucky, since books have lower VAT than some "luxury" goods such as film). It was even marked as old, collectible. Obviously, in this case they gave no **** about "real" value (newest edition of the book would cost some 10-15$), in this case they thought it's a good idea to tax the selling price. And the shipping, of course
I mean i understand high value items should not be smuggled in, but where on earth is it worthy even to hassle administration and all, to tax a single 75$ valued old book?
PS, I never ask the seller to undervalue the goods on the form. Once i asked to mark it clearly collectible, just in case. Didn't help.
However in the very beginning of me buying stuff on ebay, a quite reputable seller offered (without me asking) to mark the item as gift
) Yes the seller is also on RFF (inactive). I was rather surprised. It was a 30 bucks fixed lens rf only, though.
bmattock
Veteran
I am reading a lot of "my country charges X% import fee and it's unfair."
Yes, I get that. It sounds unfair to me too.
However, asking the seller, who didn't create the unfair tax situation and cannot do anything about it, to break the law themselves to help you correct what you see as an unfair imposition, is not the answer.
The answer is to seek redress from your own government. If that is not possible, I am sorry for you, but I won't be complicit in skirting the law, or even eBay rules, on your behalf.
Why would you expect it to be my job to do so?
Yes, I get that. It sounds unfair to me too.
However, asking the seller, who didn't create the unfair tax situation and cannot do anything about it, to break the law themselves to help you correct what you see as an unfair imposition, is not the answer.
The answer is to seek redress from your own government. If that is not possible, I am sorry for you, but I won't be complicit in skirting the law, or even eBay rules, on your behalf.
Why would you expect it to be my job to do so?
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
I'm not protesting paying taxes and I'm obeying rules and laws. But I'm not as hypocrite as you. Instead of lecturing here people from another countries how their taxes are distributed, why not to be honest to yourself.
All what you think is - why I have to cheat for someone I don't care, but if I lower the price it is me who gets skunked if item is lost or damaged.
I do declare full value of item I ship to USA. To have full insurance coverage. But I check the Gift box sometimes. Because here is no check box for "the Steal".
Sorry to bring local issues to this topic, hugs, no kisses,
Ko.
Addy101
Well-known
Hmmm, funny, I'm Dutch
Canada scores well above average in OECD rankings, so, they must be doing something good. If you're unhappy with some policies, vote in another government - just convince the idiots :angel:
krötenblender
Well-known
It's funny... I live in (northern) Germany and had several items imported from outside of the EU. Some of them purchased in auctions at low prices (less than "market value").
The customs officers I had the pleasure to deal with all were able to switch on a computer and look into the ebay auction and then calculate the tax by the real price I paid...
To the original post. I understand your point and I also would not do my buyers that favor. But also I understand the general argument of unfair taxes (although I don't believe, that this is in most cases the real reason for them to ask - they wouldn't care about others paying the tax...). Some of the taxes on especially used items and some categories of items are obviously unfair, because they were made for example for protecting the own industries. In Europe, the import taxes on Japanese photographic items do in no way relate to their value compared to other values from Asia. Its just because Europeans are not able to build cameras competitively, so the tax tries to protect something by making the better options extremely expensive.
However, asking for false declaration doesn't solve the problem. For that other measures have to be taken by voters and constituents of the respective country. These laws are not given by nature, but man made. So they can be changed.
Vics
Veteran
Yes,yes,yes!
oltimer
Well-known
As a born in Canada Canadian, I totally agree with what your saying. I have never requested it from members on here, or US dealers. Dante; their are those that think Customs are stupid and try and do get away with it at times. Yes, your right about the GST and PST due on point of sale wether here or on a import.
Moto-Uno
Moto-Uno
Isn't it somewhat redundant to remark ( among adults ) that governments misspend
their tax dollars ? Just saying. Peter
their tax dollars ? Just saying. Peter