MIkhail
-
I was developing 1990 Kodak 5231 which I shot in 2010 for a while and complaining how this film deteriorated. Turns out my developer was gone bad. With new batch the same film turned out just fine. Costed me some images I wish I did not lose. It's not worth it in my opinion.
benlees
Well-known
My Rodinal has crystals
Works fine, though if you have a weak stomach might be best to use something else
Works fine, though if you have a weak stomach might be best to use something else
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
HC-110



ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
Looks like you picked a winner! 
Chris
P.S.- Nice scans!
Chris
P.S.- Nice scans!
Roger Vadim
Well-known
BE AWARE! I ruined five films with aged Rodinal because I trusted this Internet wisdom everybody is repeating. So I found out the hard way that Rodinal (like al other developers) can go bad. If it fails, like in my case, you end up with almost blank negatives.
Since then I use fresh developer and when the Rodinal is dark brown I do a test. Hey, developer is cheap, why waste precious time and energy on 3 Dollars worth of old developer? Alas, amateurs...
Since then I use fresh developer and when the Rodinal is dark brown I do a test. Hey, developer is cheap, why waste precious time and energy on 3 Dollars worth of old developer? Alas, amateurs...
BE AWARE! I ruined five films with aged Rodinal because I trusted this Internet wisdom everybody is repeating. So I found out the hard way that Rodinal (like al other developers) can go bad. If it fails, like in my case, you end up with almost blank negatives.
Since then I use fresh developer and when the Rodinal is dark brown I do a test. Hey, developer is cheap, why waste precious time and energy on 3 Dollars worth of old developer? Alas, amateurs...
Firstly is English your native tongue? Perhaps not. Go look up the definition of "amateur" because it's not necessarily as much of a pejorative as you might think—it can depend on context. Secondly, muffing five rolls of black and white because your developer was bad is a rather amateur thing to do. You'll have to work out the context I am using the term in, for yourself.
Ronald M
Veteran
rodinal in a glass bottle that used to contain Viradon toner is good for 10 years. I stupidly discarded all the rubber stopper bottles where I could access Ordinal with hypodermic needle.
My test was 1998 to 2008 , Ordinal was fresh and decanted to glass immediately.
Tests were done yearly and more often at the beginning.
HC110 needs to be original gold color.
Why waste time do tests with expired material?? Makes no sense.
My test was 1998 to 2008 , Ordinal was fresh and decanted to glass immediately.
Tests were done yearly and more often at the beginning.
HC110 needs to be original gold color.
Why waste time do tests with expired material?? Makes no sense.
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
Why waste time do tests with expired material?? Makes no sense.
For the HC-110 test, it makes perfect sense.
- When it's a Saturday, and it's your only window
- When you can't get any other developer for days because there are no local places to buy it
- When you can run a single reel test and it works
- When it's low-value test film
- When it's shot on a lot of TMY that is in the "paper imprint" danger range
- When you have to make a call on whether the cameras/backs work for purposes of keeping or returning them
- When you were comped the film in the first place
- When the vacuum seal is still on the plastic bottle of HC-110
Dante
Sid836
Well-known
Testing the developer with the leader of the film to be developed always saves the day.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
You can't argue with success - except here! I love RFF... 
Chris
Chris
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
So is it true that the current HC-110 behaves differently?
Hern
Established
So is it true that the current HC-110 behaves differently?
That is what I'm finding with my new bottle of HC110, I'm going to verify with a couple of my mates with unexpired bottles from different batches, alongside my old trusty bottle which expired 8 years ago.
I'll report back with the results, but if anyone has a lead on old HC110, hit me up as I'm going to start my stash of an ever-increasingly rare developer.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
Freestyle HC110 clone
Freestyle HC110 clone
Has anyone tried this?: http://www.freestylephoto.biz/10190-LegacyPro-L110-Liquid-Film-Developer-1-Pint-(Makes-2-Gallons)
Chris
Freestyle HC110 clone
Has anyone tried this?: http://www.freestylephoto.biz/10190-LegacyPro-L110-Liquid-Film-Developer-1-Pint-(Makes-2-Gallons)
Chris
dourbalistar
Buy more film
Has anyone tried this?: http://www.freestylephoto.biz/10190-LegacyPro-L110-Liquid-Film-Developer-1-Pint-(Makes-2-Gallons)
Chris
Some nice examples in this Flickr album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lamarlamb/sets/72157650527788326/
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I am a long time D76 user but an unopened 7 year old bottle of Rodinal is as good as a fresh new factory filled bottle of Rodinal.
Both are great developers.
Both are great developers.
finguanzo
Well-known
Old hc-110.??
Does not exist.
Does not exist.
Dpingr1
Established
I have three bottles of Rodinal left from 2006. Even the opened one, which has turned brown, works just as well as the day I opened it two years ago. This stuff lasts forever and ever, amen.
Ronald M
Veteran
After all the work to get an image on film, I say no.
Rodinal lasts 10 years according to my tests,, 1998 to 2008. They a slight loss starts.
It was in a glass bottle and plastic may be different.
Rodinal lasts 10 years according to my tests,, 1998 to 2008. They a slight loss starts.
It was in a glass bottle and plastic may be different.
M.Hilo
Established
Dante,
I never used HC-110
The Rodinal will be fine still. Having said that, I would develop one film first. Just to get used again . . .
I never used HC-110
The Rodinal will be fine still. Having said that, I would develop one film first. Just to get used again . . .
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I'm using only Perceptol.
Leica III, Elmar 50mm f/3.5 nickel uncoated, 400-2TMY.
Erik.
Leica III, Elmar 50mm f/3.5 nickel uncoated, 400-2TMY.
Erik.

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.