Weaker AA filter...= .... better JPGs
Weaker AA filter...= .... better JPGs
Of all the rather inconsequential feature difference between the two, the E-PL1 finally delivered what I wanted. Better IQ on JPGs.
I'm one of those Post Processing haters. When I read the reviews that stated better JPG quality than the E-P1, E-P2 and the Panasonic GF-1, I bought my first M4/3 camera. I was not disappointed. Aside from the minor improvements over the E-P2, and in spite of various rants about missing control wheels (whiners), it was the camera I was waiting for.
I bought it just before the summer Car Show season and collected hundreds of images that I did very little post processing on. Some I did none.
It was specifically stated that the reason was the use of a weaker AA filter. Most p&s cameras and other camera's aimed at the consumer market use fairly strong AA filters, including entry level DSLR's.
Olympus pulled off another "best" in my book.
I operate on the assumption that if one learns the features of the camera they own, they can avoid or minimize post processing. The biggest fly in my ointment so far has been misuse of the AA filter on most cameras.
Thank You, Olympus. Now, use that same philosophy on the rumored Pen Pro, and you will have another sale.