Olympus Pen S

well, maybe i will use it,
1stly because it gives me more frame to shoot with.
But i dont know how it will be functioning, in term of photo quality, lens quality and the overall performance of the camera to compare with normal for example an RC?

will i use it, it depends on the functionality...or anymore advise?
 
IMO the price of Oly half-frames certainly seem to be rising so someone out there is buying. If the price is relatively 'peanuts' I can't see what you have to lose.

The camera is quite different to the RC and you won't get the same results but having said that its an Oly and the lens will give something very acceptable if you are not expecting large enlargements or using it in low light situations. Its much lighter, but a quiet shutter and very pocketable.
The Pen S hasn't a meter and no rangefinder so it provides a more basic photographic experience. It was supplied in the usual 'leather'pouch which is a bit fiddly due to the zip.

What are the seals like on the one on offer?
You will probably have to replace them but that isn't difficult - just a bit tedious!
It might be an idea to check up on your processing options. Are you prepared to do your own printing?

I think if you haven't experienced a 'half-framer' before go for it if its a reasonable price (£10 here in GB for a good worker).
 
I see.

The one on offer is without leather pouch, with 50 quids (GB) on the price tag(MR300). expensive eh?

Anyway, apart from it size, frames, fun,vintage, stealthy... what is the main purpose of this type of camera? It is intresting and I am curios.🙂


Now, in case I buy it, I have to think about scanning the films, as I dont think the lab will like it (to handle this type of film). Or if they do, they will charge more..emm..
 
Herman, if you want to shoot half-frame format, you'll be much happier with a Pen-F family. The lenses are beyond good and they are interchangeable. Plus the camera is one of the most beautiful/handsome.

The original Pen series was designed to be used as snapshot cameras (intended for women who would like a smaller/lighter camera to bring in their purses). The lens on the Pen S won't blow you away (after you see what a 35 RC can produce).

But as I mentioned above, the lenses on the Pen-F are *professional* grade and will knock your socks off (I know it did me the first time I printed one of the shots at 8x10).

As far as scanning, you are right, in the long run, investing in a good film scanner pays off easily the more you shoot film.

I told my lab to only develop the roll, they don't need to care whether the pictures are half-frame or not, so they don't complain.
 
Herman - hope things are getting a bit clearer for you. £50 equivalent is not a realistic price for a Pen S - forget that comera - there are others around.

shadowfox has a point about the Pen F series.
Its a splendid design and concept.
However I would advise you to handle one before you buy, and if possibly buy the one you handle and like.
My Pen F wasn't very satisfactory - in fact after the first film through I was disappointed. The standard lens developed back-lash and I was never convinced that it ever focussed properly. But that is many years ago.
But again the Pen F series was made many years ago. The seals tend to disintegrate very suddenly and the bits easily get into the workings and jam the film wind mechanism. There has been discussion on the web about the shutter activation levers on the back of the interchangeable lenses being sleepy and not operating smoothly.
So those are the reasons why I suggest you buy one you have examined or handled. Some very specific questions to ebay sellers might get you the information you want about how the camera works. Some assurance that you can return the camera if it isn't as described would seem to me to be essential.
When these cameras work they are superb and the Olympus lenses are generally excellent.
As far as cost is concerned in GB I would imagine that I would be expecting to pay £75+ for a PenF with a standard lens - case included. The PenFT will cost more.
I'm not sure what you will really gain from buying a Pen F series camera. The Olympus OM1 isn't all that bigger, is easier to work on, is much cheaper and has a good range of excellent lenses. I would imagine that image quality would be much better too. Does that confuse matters?
After getting an Olympus OM1 I never used my Pen F again. In fact with little regret I gave it away to a RFF menber. I sometimes wonder if he got it working again. I do have an Olymous 35RC like you - but, I'm not looking to add an Olympus Pen series camera to my little accumulation of Olympus bits and pieces.

Hope this all helps!

jesse
 
Herman

Just seen your reply to Will - shadowfox!

Do some reseach on the Oly 35RD - you do know about the shutter blade issue don't you? How about 35SP instead?
At present i'm 'in love' with a 35ECR.

jesse
 
the RD just come across my mind...but the syndrome is not too serious. 🙂

Jesse, ive already get my 35SP fixed, im so lucky that it survived the recent 'stucked focusing lever problem', and after the services, it looks like new. gonna handle it with extra - extra care now...

Your opinion about the Pen and OM1 is very helpfull, but it is not a rangefinder, neither nor Pen.(full vs half frame). So its gonna be a different case all together.

BTW i really appreciate your insight comment and experience about those cameras..it gives me some clear input about the value for money part.

oh yeah, now ive been offered a Pen FT instead of Pen F..with one lens. Im still waiting for the lens type. The price is about 130 (GB) not yet bargain..i think the seller try to cheat me...

the truth is, im really curious about this half frames thingy..that makes me want to own one..but if it doesnt pay, i better scrap the idea..save some money, go extra mile to get a good scanner (as per Will's suggestion). 🙂

oh mine...the Oly acquisition syndrome ...
 
Hi Herman

I think you have cracked it!
Scanner as No 1 priority!

Pen camera can wait.
Incidentally I have a Pen D which has a super lens - a more versatile camera than the Pen S.
The Pen FT you have offered is far too expensive - IMO!

jesse
 
Herman, GAS warning...















2231255988_6e0e24061a.jpg



I've warned you 😉
 
Buy an Olympus Pen! They're good and fun! The first picture is the full el-cheapo drug store scan, the second is the cropped and b&w converted version. The camera is an Olympus Pen S 3.5 and the film Fuji 1600. Exposure was probably 1/250 and f/5.6; just about ideal for image quality.
 

Attachments

  • DaveFrankBill.jpg
    DaveFrankBill.jpg
    78.4 KB · Views: 14
  • DigitalDave.jpg
    DigitalDave.jpg
    121.4 KB · Views: 14
  • OlyPenS3.5.jpg
    OlyPenS3.5.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:
I have the Pen S and the Pen FT. In my opinion, half-frame cameras can give you interesting looking images with either very fine grain film for excellent prints that do not reveal the use of a half-frame camera, or with a grainy high speed film. The grain will be even larger looking than with 135mm film.

As for the "look" of such Pen cameras, it is beautiful.
 
Adding to this thread because its the only one I could find about the PEN S. All the other Oly half frame threads are about the PEN W or the SLRs. I have a couple PEN Ss and really enjoy these cameras. Here are a couple recent shots from my 3cm f2.8 version


46593240094_4cc8265314_c.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

laptoprob
dead Agfa Optima-Parat provides donor Solinar for Fujifilm
Replies
6
Views
240
petronius
petronius
J
  • Article Article
Shooting with the half-frame Olympus Pen D3: Last of the “viewfinder Pens,” it delivers fun plus superb performance
Replies
7
Views
865
wlewisiii
W
Jbennett68
Olympus Pen F viewfinders.
Replies
12
Views
1K
Jbennett68
Jbennett68
Jake Mongey
The Olympus Pen EP3 in 2025 and other 12MP Micro 4/3 Cameras
Replies
6
Views
1K
joe bosak
J
S
Olympus quick flash AFL-S 35mm camera
Replies
6
Views
547
Sean B
S
Back
Top Bottom