Olympus XA 4 - undecided

River Dog

Always looking
Local time
2:33 PM
Joined
Feb 5, 2011
Messages
619
I picked up a XA 4 today for a good price but I am not sure that I like it, apart from the 28mm and close focus, I prefer the Rollei 35 S I got last week for pretty much the same price.

Here are two different styles from today. What do you think, where does the XA 4 fit? Seems odd to set the distance, but everything else is auto.

6905502250_69587a6166_c.jpg


7051593351_61be319d3f_c.jpg
 
You have a point Frank. It's cheaper to carry a couple of these little cameras than to buy separate lenses and I have a project in mind where I will need some wide shots with close focus.
 
Intended purpose for the XA4

Intended purpose for the XA4

The XA4 was originally intended as a close focus macro camera. In fact, you don't have a complete XA4 unless you also have the red carry cord that a black button slides on to stretch out to the ideal close focus. In all my camera years, I have seen only one of the XA4 measure cords for the camera, and I bought it separately from a camera.

However, the XA4 stands in nicely for a quick action zone focus street camera. It delivers nice quality and may have less manual control than the rollei, which would be the rollei's strong suit.

Personally, I like the XA2 for a no brainer zone focus camera, but mostly because I like the slightly exaggerated vignetting of the XA2.
 
The lens on the XA4 is quite sharp, and the two cameras have quite different fields of view and as Frank said, would make a nice pair.

One criticism I have of the XA4 is the vignetting - it's not like the more pleasing "corner darkening" of the XA2 (which I still use), but more of a dark vertical zone on the two sides of the pictiure. It is visible in the second of your photos. I have seen it worse in some of my own photos, that were perhaps underexposed a bit.

Those dark bands were often distracting enough to me that I had to spend time dodging the edges abit to lightene them up.
 
One criticism I have of the XA4 is the vignetting
Yeah, I was wondering about that. It only appears in the shadows of some of the shots but I am still not sold on the camera. I might just flip it on eBay.

Anyway, tomorrow I run out my CL with a 40mm Rokkor for the first time. Back with the big boys :)
 
I would say the XA 4 makes a fine, inconspicuous camera for street photography. Load it up w/ Tri-X or HP5, bring a second camera w/ a 50 lens, and you've got a great walking-around set.
 
They are so cheap and small, that I can't see stressing over it. just use it when you have the need and let it sit when you don't.
 
Yeah, I was wondering about that. It only appears in the shadows of some of the shots but I am still not sold on the camera. I might just flip it on eBay.

Anyway, tomorrow I run out my CL with a 40mm Rokkor for the first time. Back with the big boys :)

It'd be interesting to do a few duplicate shots for comparison with the 40 on the CL and the 40 on the Rollei.
 
I had a XA2 once and I never liked it. The big majority of shots displayed some horrid vignetting, almost like Holga. I always wondered about my sample - the pictures you have here from your XA4 look fantastic, i wish my ex XA2 was performing this nice!
 
It'd be interesting to do a few duplicate shots for comparison with the 40 on the CL and the 40 on the Rollei.
You're on but the weather was nasty today - typical for the Easter break in England. I'll do some comparisons when it brightens up a bit.
 
I would say XA + XA4 make a great street photo team.

...but if you have doubt, then it means it is not for you (or your photography style). no matter what other says.


I also have a XA, that has not been tested, so it would make an interesting experiment. They are no problem to carry around after all :)
 
Back
Top Bottom