PentHassyKon
Established
..........
But a word of caution from my personal experience with the Olympus... it excels in the test that DPreview puts it through! It is very strong in macro performance, and especially so when the lighting is good (as in the case of DPReview's studio set-up). Real world performance tends to dip... so that is why I'm posting these photos. 🙂
This is specifically what I'm interested in. Not looking for it to replace my FF film or even APS-C but something to decide between the aforementioned models.
Guess I'll take a 2nd look at the DPReview review of the XZ-1.
I'm torn between the pocketability of the S95, the 24mm on the LX-5 and the XZ-1's "fast" lens.
Bottom line for the XZ-1 appears to be how it's fast lens allows usage of the camera in low-light which as you've stated is not how DPReview shows ea of the camera's output.
Of course there is always the Fuji X100 😀
Again, thank you for the review. Have you other digital camera's to compare it against?