gilpen123
Gil
It's not the stabilization but rather aligning horizon and resting the base on my left palm. I did took some lowlight at high ISO and it's actually very good in doing the job, however, I have a lot of wonky aligned shots.
The Oly 12mm/F2 is a very, very nice lens!Now begins the process of defining a solid lens kit. I didn't do any side by side comparisons of the images produced by the Panny 20 and the Lux 25...I did compare the size and how they felt on the camera, and decided for the 20. I also love the 40mm POV and always have. And I figure i might just get the Nokton .95 down the road and do shallow DOF in a big way. So the Lux is up for sale. So too is my M. Zuiko 9-18mm...great little lens, very sharp, but I'm not really a superwide kind of guy. I just got the 14 pancake and it's tiny and sharp and about as wide as I usually know what to do with.
So right now I have the 14 and 20 pancakes, and will probably get the 45/1.8 soon. And then...still considering a weatherproof 4/3 lens like the 14-54mm II. So I can really go out in a rainstorm!
Oly did right with the E-M5 but I feel like they're behind in m43 lenses and Panny has the edge. There's no rumors about a m4/3 replacement of the truly great 12-60 or even the 14-54mm II, and yet Panny is coming out with a faster zoom later this year. Get on it Oly, when you try you make amazing glass. Kick it into gear instead of making three variations of essentially the same camera for young Japanese women!
Now begins the process of defining a solid lens kit.
I've been doing the same.. Lumix 14, 20, Oly 45mm f 1.8.
If you want a zoom.. Lumix 14-42 zoom (the ASPH - the begger 14-42mm Lumix lens), don't get it too wet..
Thinking that myself.
So far I got 25/1.4 and 45/1.8, hoping to add 14/2.5 or 12/2.0. The leaked PDF says the new Oly 75/1.8 has über IQ.
I'd love to see a consistent F2.8 weather sealed zoom for my occasional paid gigs in near future...
Lensrentals just did a resolution comparison of <25mm m43 lenses, and the 14/2.5 did better than the 12/2 at the wider settings. At f4 the 12mm pulled a bit ahead.
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/05/wide-angle-micro-43-imatest-results
It's just one test, but it seems the 14 is a heck of a lens for a very low price. Just got mind today...I'll try to post some images tomorrow. Maybe down the line I'll splurge on the 12....but for $160 I couldn't refuse the 14!
Please do post! I didn't realize the going price of this lens was that low. Combined with a god lab results, I am definitely interested to see it in action.
Now begins the process of defining a solid lens kit. I didn't do any side by side comparisons of the images produced by the Panny 20 and the Lux 25...I did compare the size and how they felt on the camera, and decided for the 20. I also love the 40mm POV and always have. And I figure i might just get the Nokton .95 down the road and do shallow DOF in a big way. So the Lux is up for sale. So too is my M. Zuiko 9-18mm...great little lens, very sharp, but I'm not really a superwide kind of guy. I just got the 14 pancake and it's tiny and sharp and about as wide as I usually know what to do with.
So right now I have the 14 and 20 pancakes, and will probably get the 45/1.8 soon. And then...still considering a weatherproof 4/3 lens like the 14-54mm II. So I can really go out in a rainstorm!
i had no idea either, thanks for the heads up. there are some sellers on *bay selling them unboxed, as lenses that were part of kits they broke up. i just ordered one at that price. there are some international sellers but there's also one in NJ that's selling low with a 14 day return.
A few shots with the Panny 20.
![]()
Shot with the LCD using the touch-screen focus. Zora is really hard to photograph on her walk to school...she's a fidget monster. I was shocked that the E-M5 focused and shot so quickly! Taken wide open.
![]()
Shot wide open in very dark twilight at 6400. Up close, the full size image does show some swirly noise structure, but it's not bad. No color noise which is interesting. I'm pretty sure this was shot with the noise reduction completely off. I'll have to shoot some high ISO stuff in RAW.
![]()
One of the things I've loved about Olympus' imaging train since the E-5 is the lack of the AA filter (or lightness of it). Zooming in is just a joy, you don't get that weird fine-detail blur like with many other cameras. I know it's not a big deal in practical terms, but it saves me the step of sharpening, etc. The JPEG engine really does a great job.