Apropos of your earlier posts:
So you've dropped digital completely and converted to film? That's a bold move my friend. I'm still on the fence, but find myself shooting about 60/40 film to digital. It's really hard to beat digital for convenience, but film is just so satisfying to work with. If you work exclusively in 135, I will recommend the Plustek series of film scanners. I use the 7300 and I've been really pleased with it. It gives good results with a minimal learning curve. It takes a little longer to scan a roll, but it's much easier to find than a Nikon Coolscan, at a much much better price (I think I paid $200 for mine). Just something to think about.
Hello Nikku,
Thanks for your comments and advice. Believe me, I was a bit timid going back to film, especially since even though starting out with film, I really learned most of what I know about photography with digital.
It's just that after five years, I slowly became disenchanted with digital. First with all the gear I was lugging around - a giant DSLR (then two) with correspondingly large constant aperture zooms, lightstands, strobes, PW's, etc. Then the over dependence on zoom lenses for composition, the machine gun approach to shooting resulting in hundreds of photographs with a few gems here and there instead of dozens of more carefully considered and composed shots. Digital made me lazier.
And film also has a certain look, a certain feel, something I just like better. I may go back to digital eventually, probably, but I think I'm going to stick with film for the most part. Besides as far as convenience goes, photography is not my main job anyway. For a while there I was supplementing my income doing weddings, family reunions, parties and other events, theater and portfolios, etc. Even got a few photos in local papers. I never really considered myself a pro (but after seeing every "pro's" website listed in the local yellow pages, maybe I should reconsider! More likely, the real pros don't have time for web pages.) and probably would have starved if I'd tried to go full time.
At any rate, I finally decided that I am not, and never will be, a business man and decided that I could be perfectly happy, actually much happier, being an amateur, then started shedding equipment and turning down the few jobs I was offered. Actually, that didn't take too long because I just stopped networking and marketing, which I hated doing anyway. First the lights, then the second body, then down to one DSLR and two lenses, and one lens.
Shortly after that, saw an OM1 and a light went off. Did some research, got intrigued, got a couple of OM's and sold the rest of the digital gear. I'm much happier now!
Anyway, I appreciate your advice. I've been leaning towards a Plustek or an Epson v700 so far, based on my research, and have to say that the Plustek does sound like an excellent value. My only reservation about it is that I have been shooting some MF lately.
A coworker gave me an old Ricohmatic 225 that needed some TLC, but it cleaned up well and and I surprised myself by fixing a few problems and the meter even works now! I also acquired a Rollei Baby Gray in good shape a couple of weeks ago (lately old cameras have just been falling in my lap, unsolicited!) and got a dozen rolls of 127 film to try. Too early to tell whether TLR's are my thing or not, but I am intrigued and initial results (just one roll through the Ricohmatic) are looking good. Hope to shoot several more rolls tomorrow. The weather here, and my responsibilities over the last month and a half, have cut in to my time, but I see good light at the end of the tunnel.
If I decide to keep shooting MF, I guess I'll have to hold out for something else, like the v700 maybe, scanner-wise, but the Plustek sounds hard to beat for 135.
Thanks again for the advice. Sorry to ramble on so, I don't get to talk much at home, mostly have to listen!
Take care and happy shooting!