One can get lucky sometimes!

shadowfox

Darkroom printing lives
Local time
6:29 AM
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
8,770
*** Added some test pictures from this camera below ***

I am a happy camper.

I bid for a non-working Olympus DC on the 'Bay several months ago for cheap. I left the package under the table for months partly because I knew it wasn't a working camera, and I was not keen on finding out in what shape it'll be in. And I have other cameras that needed testing.

A couple days ago, I decided to open the package and give it a look. The camera was as expected, not working, the shutter won't go even with a newish battery. The shutter release is in deep recess, the film advance lever is stuck, opening the back, everything is in order, the film spools are rotating fine, but nothing can unstuck the shutter assembly.

Other than that, the cosmetics are more than ok, it's very clean, a couple of faint scratches is all.

Then I noticed something weird about the position of the self-timer lever. It's out of kilt (pointing towards down), looks like a disjointed shoulder (ouch!). On a whim, I bent the lever even more towards the bottom of the camera.

And voila! with a whir, the self-timer went alive! when it arrived at the normal position, I heard the best sound I heard that day: A click! the shutter release pops up... and everything else starts working!

So I have a practically *new* Olympus 35 DC.

What's the big deal you may ask?

Well, personally, this camera was released in 1971 which makes it exactly the same age as I am, that's the sentimental part...

Also, this camera has the same lens Olympus put in the famous RD, an F.Zuiko 40mm/1.7 which will make this camera a superb indoor shooter.

... And, the lens is 49mm in diameter, making all of my OM lens filter usable on it.

Unlike the RD, the camera decides for you which aperture and shutter combination to use, that may sound bad, but this is Olympus we're talking about, they KNOW how to auto-select exposure settings. Want proofs? look for sample pictures from the XA2/3/4 and Trip 35.

Here's some shots of the camera:

534614835_520e592099.jpg


closer up...

534614885_a88b58ef50.jpg


Some test pictures:

Sharpness, detail, and bokeh test:

536038526_a02a90a7c5.jpg


next, highlights and shadow:

536156305_4c81a803b3_o.jpg


next, color rendition (morning light):

536039294_d47be4b154_o.jpg


... no post-processing other than crop has been done to these pictures.

More samples in this flickr set

CONCLUSION: Darn, no wonder the 35 RD are still fetching good money on the used market these days. This 40mm/1.7 lens is of *very* good quality. I don't really mind relinquishing control of the exposure settings to the camera itself, as the sample pictures have proven to me, Olympus did a good job "programming" this camera.
 
Last edited:
shadowfox said:
Well, personally, this camera was released in 1971 which makes it exactly the same age as I am, that's the sentimental part...

I am not the only one then... I have been "released" two years before you and I also have quite a few cameras just because they were from the same year as I am. The dearest to me is a black F with non metering prism, a 35mm f 1:2 and serial number 69xxxxxx...

GLF
 
giellaleafapmu said:
I am not the only one then... I have been "released" two years before you and I also have quite a few cameras just because they were from the same year as I am. The dearest to me is a black F with non metering prism, a 35mm f 1:2 and serial number 69xxxxxx...

GLF

Wow, the Nkon F, that's quite a legend to be "related" with 🙂

There's a poll here in RFF that asks which camera is "related" to you. That's where I got to find out that this camera is exactly my age.
 
shadowfox said:
Wow, the Nkon F, that's quite a legend to be "related" with 🙂

There's a poll here in RFF that asks which camera is "related" to you. That's where I got to find out that this camera is exactly my age.

Well, you can be related to a Nikon F too...just find a 1971 Nikon F and you are done...

GLF
 
It is a beautiful camera and appears to be all metal not plastic...
My Olympus 35-S (1957 era, Fixed Lens) has the G. Zuiko 4.2cm 1.8 so I guess they are closely related...The lens is indeed sharp but with a soft overall look.
I don't think I have ever used color film in it...I just might give it a try...
I had to look again...Nice camera you got there!!
 
Sam: I think Olympus got a lot of mileage out of that G.Zuiko formula. 40mm, 42mm and 50mm.

Erik: Yeah, I hate shadow too. Not because of his good fortune, but because the effect he has on my wallet. In the past I'd thought about the DC, but really lusted after the RD. I currently am budgeting for a good scanner, so any more camera purchases are on hold, at least in the RD price range. But since a good DC can be had for peanuts, I may just try to slip one into the house.

Holy crap those are nice shots!
 
Trius said:
Erik: Yeah, I hate shadow too. Not because of his good fortune, but because the effect he has on my wallet. In the past I'd thought about the DC, but really lusted after the RD. I currently am budgeting for a good scanner, so any more camera purchases are on hold, at least in the RD price range. But since a good DC can be had for peanuts, I may just try to slip one into the house.

Speaking of wallet, I am in a dire need to sell stuff 😱

Now that I have the DC, I'm done looking for an RD.
 
Shadowfox

Am I right in thinking the DC has a backlight button to give at least some exposure control? I have a similar Oly ECR and Minolta Himatic E, neither of which have that control.
 
zuikologist said:
Shadowfox

Am I right in thinking the DC has a backlight button to give at least some exposure control? I have a similar Oly ECR and Minolta Himatic E, neither of which have that control.

That is correct, I've yet to test it. I've been counting my blessing that this camera works at all. I'll give it a test with the next roll.
 
Back
Top Bottom