super7668
Member
I'm looking for one lens (prefer small and fast, can carry everyday), which one is your choice?
I like the CV 28/1.9 but it's huge;
ZM 21/2.8 is a bit slow;
same as CV 21/4;
CV 15/4.5 a bit wide and slow;
Avenon?
Leica?
Any more choice? Which one works best for you?
Thanks for any advice.
I like the CV 28/1.9 but it's huge;
ZM 21/2.8 is a bit slow;
same as CV 21/4;
CV 15/4.5 a bit wide and slow;
Avenon?
Leica?
Any more choice? Which one works best for you?
Thanks for any advice.
JonasYip
Well-known
When I go out with the R-D1 and one lens, it's usually a Nokton 40/1.4, which is both small and fast. I'm also happy with just a 35 lux ASPH too.
But of course the 35-40mm focal length works for me... looks like you want something wider.
FWIW, I assumed that a 28/2 would be the default lens on my R-D1, but in practice I find 35-40 works well for me.
j
But of course the 35-40mm focal length works for me... looks like you want something wider.
FWIW, I assumed that a 28/2 would be the default lens on my R-D1, but in practice I find 35-40 works well for me.
j
emraphoto
Veteran
vc 35mm f2.8 pancake... is very compact. truth be told the 15mm heliar rarely comes off my r-d1s!!! i love it!
Steve Litt
Well-known
Summicron C 40mm is my number 1 lens on the RD-1.
Regards
Steve
Regards
Steve
Tuolumne
Veteran
I second the vote for 35 lux ASPH. This gives exceptional rendition, a reasonable field of view, and is very fast and not too big.
/T
/T
Erik Schoeber
Erik Schoeber
I lalso ike the 15 mm, its's a fine lens and it realy invites you to the subject...
LCT
ex-newbie
Was the Summicron-C 40/2, now preferably the (late) pre-asph Summilux-M 35/1.4 but the pre-asph Summicron-M 35/2 IV is another great choice IMHO.
emraphoto
Veteran
how did i forget the 40 'cron... shesh
emraphoto
Veteran
i mean sheesh
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
This superwide thing is getting old...
With the RD-1's crop factor (and assuming it wouldn't be used on anything without a crop) I would go with the Zeiss 25mm Biogon because it's essentailly a 35mm
With the RD-1's crop factor (and assuming it wouldn't be used on anything without a crop) I would go with the Zeiss 25mm Biogon because it's essentailly a 35mm
JNewell
Leica M Recidivist
Small lens: 35mm Summicron
Not-so-small lens: Tri-Elmar (which matches the three framelines of the R-D1)
Not-so-small lens: Tri-Elmar (which matches the three framelines of the R-D1)
georgef
Well-known
CV 15 for the fun, artistic pics and 28 1.9 for night. I tried, but can't do a single lens..even though if I had a 21 2.0 the size of the 21 3.5 it would be it!
Tuolumne
Veteran
JNewell said:Small lens: 35mm Summicron
Not-so-small lens: Tri-Elmar (which matches the three framelines of the R-D1)
I use the tri-elmar on my R-D1 and like it very much. It's good in daylight, but it is slow (f4) for night shooting, and fairly big and heavy, too. That said, it's what I usually choose to take with my R-D1 in the daytime. It's nice in that its 3 focal lengths cover the three frame lines built in to the R-D1.
/T
mwooten
light user
40mm M-Rokkor --
Small, light in weight, reasonable in price -- but not available new. I bought mine from keh.com for a bit under $300 with shipping. It works so well on the RD1. Nice petite contrast and color rendition that can be jacked-up in RAW work-flow if desired.
That's only if I had one lens to carry on a walk around.
Small, light in weight, reasonable in price -- but not available new. I bought mine from keh.com for a bit under $300 with shipping. It works so well on the RD1. Nice petite contrast and color rendition that can be jacked-up in RAW work-flow if desired.
That's only if I had one lens to carry on a walk around.
Hephaestus
Established
Don't forget the C/V 40mm 1.4.
emraphoto
Veteran
i don't know about the "super wide" getting old bit but i'd really give the 15mm heliar a try if your out and about on the street!
sonwolf
Established
Assuming Leica and Zeiss are out of the question, I would choose the CV 28mm 1.9 Ultron. The lens matches the widest frame line on the R-D1 and performs optically well on the camera, without significant vignetting. The 43mm field of view on the 28mm Ultron is a good compromise between a wide angle and normal lens. At 1.9, the lens is very practical for low light photography. The one downside is the 28mm Ultron is a fairly large lens for the camera.
If you are more a 50mm shooter, the 35mm 1.7 Ultron offers a 53mm field of view in a smaller, lighter package, and nearly matches the optical quality of the 28mm.
Both lenses have been discontinued but are still available from Cameraquest.
If you are more a 50mm shooter, the 35mm 1.7 Ultron offers a 53mm field of view in a smaller, lighter package, and nearly matches the optical quality of the 28mm.
Both lenses have been discontinued but are still available from Cameraquest.
dreamsandart
Well-known
I picked up a new Voigtlander 3.5/28 at a shop's close out sale at a great price for both my film and Epson. Great lens and its been living on my Epson.
super7668
Member
Thanks for all inputs.
Since I don't have the R-D1S on hand yet, I probably will get one of these two for now, which one will be more usable on it?
Zeiss Biogon T* 21mm f/2.8
CV 40/1.4
cheers.
Since I don't have the R-D1S on hand yet, I probably will get one of these two for now, which one will be more usable on it?
Zeiss Biogon T* 21mm f/2.8
CV 40/1.4
cheers.
LCT
ex-newbie
40 is OK if you don't favour close ups and the 40/1.4 is a good choice if you like it's bokeh but instead of 21 i'd much prefer a 28 as a first lens personally.super7668 said:...which one will be more usable on it? Zeiss Biogon T* 21mm f/2.8 - CV 40/1.4...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.