Krosya
Konicaze
I disagree. Caveat emptor is not a license for sellers to deceive customers and does not excuse a seller from responsibility to adequately and honestly describe merchandise. This is particularly so in the case of used merchandise, and even more so on an online market because the potential buyer cannot examine the merchandise prior to purchase.
In the absence of any other description, the word "used" indicates that the item is functioning correctly. This camera clearly is not functioning correctly. The seller deserves to be faulted for at least an incomplete description, if not a deceptive description.
I disagree. 😉
If I was to list something for sale, it's MY right to represent item the best way I know how. Who is to say that seller didnt do that? To that person ability he or she "may have" done all they could to describe it. If the way I do it lowers number of bids or total selling price - I will not blame anyone. If a buyer doesnt like my description - he/she can ask questions, or not bid if they are not comfortable - nobody twists their arm to buy from me, or any other seller for that matter.
Word "used" doesnt indicate anything other that item was, well.....used. I.E. - not new.
When I shop on ebay, or elsewhere, for that matter, I usually try not to buy from a seller like one in this story. But if I do - I realize the risk and am willing to take it. But for sure I dont post on a camera forum about a case, where $40 camera is not as described, plus seller is willing to refund most of the money anyway.🙄