Taipei-metro
Veteran
Hi,Michiel said:Conclusion:
Unless someone convinces me that the seemingly randon grain/exposure issues are not a problem with the film, but my (camera's) problem or a problem with the developing, I will not buy this Konica Minolta 400 again. It might be a bit cheaper, compared to Kodak or Fuji, but if these are the results one can expect I consider the quality unacceptable.
After I finished the other two rolls I bought (I bought a three-pack) and find that these problems are consistant, I will stay away from Konica Minolta film.
I've shot hundreds of rolls of Konica 100, 200, 400 starting when they're called Sakura.
I would suggest, bring your K film to Fuji lab, if you don't like their prints, ask your photographer friends, which lab they frequented, or ask the lab people if there is any better labs around.
This labs charge 10 to 15 cents per print which is very cheap. Kodak labs charge more, you can take your Konica to them to see if they did better than Fuji.
Use a Slr and 35 f2 lens to test indoor shoots.