Rik
Established
not sure what stuff you mean? the hydrochloric acid? got a 5 liter can from Hornbach. You need the strong stuff, i think 30%.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Yes, I have already discussed this about not using modeling paint, but automoblie or gun shop grade paints, the RLM Grey will have to be hand mixed and then airbrushed, we are also testing the vulcanite while the vulcanite on the old Grey cameras was also spray painted and not Grey colored and last but not least the "woodsmetal" engraving filler will be the real challenge, to get that semi off white filler to put in the engraving - I want to try to do that first before I use just a normal paintstick - I`m still waitning on the camera in the post so I can inspect it and decide what`s the first step with all the bodywork, the camera seems like it has some dents and nicks, but if it`s better than it looks, then I have to think again about the paintjob
Tom
Last edited:
FallisPhoto
Veteran
Assuming you used an automotive grade enamel, then yes, it takes from 12 to about 24 hours. The stuff I used last says "Use low steady heat for lengthy periods of time for best results on small runs." I wanted an exact time and asked around. I didn't find one. Several automotive and camera repair websites recommended between 12 and 24 hours though.
Last edited:
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
I just received the 1945 Leica IIIC K to IIIFBD conversion today
(it`s in the #393xxx series which I estimate is somewhere in the October/November/December 1945 production series - it was a Ball Bearing "Full Race/Kugellager" camera at one time, fully upgraded to IIIFBD specs -
the serial # has been photoshopped out for security reasons as always)
It`s a really nice "user" camera for sure - it has nicks and some small dent issues, but the major question is with the possible paintjob - will it work with the engraving? (I need some advice)
The engraving is very very thin and not very deep on this camera, (the pre #400000 cameras have a shallower engraving then later cameras) and during WW2 when the cameras were painted Grey, they had like a "woodsmetal" type of filler in the engraving so they stood out over the Grey paint
The camera has also been recovered (though not very good) while the original vulcanite more than likely fell off like 45+ years ago - I would consider replacing it with a Leica IIIF style vulcanite, but I don`t think that a IIIF donor body will work because the shape of the vulcanite is different - well the covering on it I don`t like now, but something that`s really close to the IIIF style would be enough for me, while this is a custom camera just for my personal shooting anyway
The rear eyepiece was also replaced with a plastic IIIF one
(I want to go back to the original IIIC Brass eyepiece * changing for pure vanity while it looks better semi/gloss black) - it`s quite possible that the viewfinder and everything inside was replaced also, while it`s very bright and crisp)
Funny but in the conversion the bottom plate was`nt switched over
(strange) but the bottom plate is like new and still has the factory serial number pencil markings on it
Speeds and all functions are deadon, just needs ton be cleaned and fresh lube and some small tweaks done, the curtains look great, so hopefully they will be no problem
I`m going to run a TEST roll through it this weekend and then think about what`s going to be done with it and the painting......the engraving and the original pattern IIIF vulcanite will be the biggest hassle if I decide to paint
Tom
PS: That lens is a late run 1936 1.5/50 Leitz Xenon, which is a perfect looking lens on this camera, we`ll see this weekend how the pair "get along"
Last edited:
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
You're using the wrong kind of modeling paint.
Try Floquil or Scalecoat (original formula for each). These paints are designed to harden on brass. A properly painted brass locomotive is very difficult to scratch.
On the paint jobs I've done, mostly M3s, the "M3 - xxxxxx' serial number engraving is usually shallower than the 'Leica' script engraving. This is not usually a problem, unless there are dings and dents or pitting in the general area of the engravings. To fix these flaws usually requires more layers of paint, which tends to fill in the shallow engravings. This can be worked around to some degree with great effort, time and the right equipment...
If there are no such flaws that need to be fixed, with the proper spray equipment, it's possible to put on just enough paint to sufficiently cover the surface but not enough to overwhelm the serial number engravings.
I don't have a thread mount Leica of that vintage, so I don't have way to compare the engraving depth...
Not sure if that helps you.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
I think that there`s three slight dent isssues, (that slotted shaped dent in the middle and a pin shaped one above the serial number the right top corner has a little dent as well) but I think the two top ones`s will both come out really good once the tops taken off and they can be tapped out ever so slightly
I think the nicks are the biggest problem I can see and the shallow engraving - I`m open to suggestions
Tom
Last edited:
radiocemetery
Well-known
Tom,
In keeping with the age of your camera, you could approach the dent repair in the same way the old time body men did. You could flow some solder into the dents and then sand down the solder to a smooth surface. This approach assumes that you are going to take the chrome off the plates. Lead takes paint well.
In keeping with the age of your camera, you could approach the dent repair in the same way the old time body men did. You could flow some solder into the dents and then sand down the solder to a smooth surface. This approach assumes that you are going to take the chrome off the plates. Lead takes paint well.
Last edited:
smiling gecko
pure dumb luck, my friend
...wow!!
...wow!!
i am amazed and impressed at the level of interest and skill in repainting cameras in the rff community.
if the canon pellix i got awhle back wasn't in such good cosmetic condition (AND i could afford it) i would love to have it redone in black lacquer (?) like the EF and F-1.
...while i'm wishing, oh...a hammertone finnish for leica m6 with it's fading zinc finnish...or maybe on my mamiya6 (oops, too much plastic).
meanwhile...it's all good.
take care,
kenneth
...wow!!
i am amazed and impressed at the level of interest and skill in repainting cameras in the rff community.
if the canon pellix i got awhle back wasn't in such good cosmetic condition (AND i could afford it) i would love to have it redone in black lacquer (?) like the EF and F-1.
...while i'm wishing, oh...a hammertone finnish for leica m6 with it's fading zinc finnish...or maybe on my mamiya6 (oops, too much plastic).
meanwhile...it's all good.
take care,
kenneth
FallisPhoto
Veteran
If you are going to paint the thing, why are the nicks a problem? Those too deep to be buffed out, you fill with lead or putty, as you would for any other kind of bodywork.
As for the engraving, It occurrs to me that maybe you could use a wax-resist method, with most paints. Fill the engraving with wax first, before painting. The wax will repel the paint. Paint the camera and let it dry very thoroughly. The paint will go everywhere except into the engraving (or anywhere else that is covered in wax). When baking the enamel, the wax will melt and run out. You could probably clean up the engraving then without too much effort, if necessary, using a dental pick (just tiny specks of paint in the engraving, not stuck very well).
Last edited:
Rik
Established
what is the best paint (white) to be used for engravings?
FallisPhoto
Veteran
Rik
Established
Thanks, I'll have a look.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
I`ve since decided NOT to paint this camera afterall, it`s going to stay the way it is......it`s currently out for CLA but, it will be back in action in a week or so once again
Tom
Harry Lime
Practitioner
I'm late in to the thread, but I used www.acmeplating.com to have my cameras stripped of chrome etc.