Path to Democracy

Belle

Established
Local time
12:56 PM
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
122
I took these photographs some twenty plus years ago when South Korea was at the cross roads of moving from dictatorship to a democracy. The student lead movement resulted in free elections, freedom of press, and a democratically elected president. Today, South Korea is a fully democratic country.

I was compelled to post these image after watching what is unfolding in Iran right now. I hope the Iranians achieve their goal of gaining freedom and basic rights.
 

Attachments

  • picture-54.jpg
    picture-54.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-55.jpg
    picture-55.jpg
    51.9 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-14.jpg
    picture-14.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 0
A few more photographs.
 

Attachments

  • picture-12.jpg
    picture-12.jpg
    41.4 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-25.jpg
    picture-25.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-45.jpg
    picture-45.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 0
Here are the last of these series.
 

Attachments

  • picture-11.jpg
    picture-11.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-24.jpg
    picture-24.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 0
  • picture-50.jpg
    picture-50.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 0
People get what they are willing to accept. Freedom comes at a price. At some point dictators get the message and leave town-- Samosa, Marcos, Ceauşescu -- but not until they have murdered everyone that challenged their authority.

Until there is democracy and the rule of law in fact, there will be a polarization of economic power resulting in a few rich groups and the others poor -- this is the model that most of the people of the world have been willing to accept.
 
Great photos. You should have worked for a news service.

Speaking of Iran, do you really think those in power are going to give that up for the sake of the people. No way. They will get their bullies to murder people in the streets, gather up and imprison or kill all that disagree and act upon it.
Same old dictators, different names, that's all.


Luxlover
 
If you look in the second set of photos. The guys in white motorcycle helmets were ex-cons and thugs that the dictator brought in to do all the heavy beating and bashing. The riot police in green were just soldiers force to do their job.

In the case of Korea, the momentum was enormous, international pressure high, and the Olympics just around the corner. In addition, you had a highly educated and media savvy middle class who were the majority. The dictator eventually buckled and opened themselves up to free elections. The media also opened up. People were no longer buying into propaganda.

I do see some parallels, but what strikes me most about Iran is the sheer number of women fighting for their rights too.

I was too young to know then, but I really appreciate freedom and basic rights that I have, living here in America.
 
Last edited:
Interesting photos. Thanks for posting!

I follow the events in Iran closely. The Iranians, or Persians as I think they prefer to be refered to, is an ancient nation that can track their roots back several millenia. They are proud of their herritage and the younger generations are well educated and very much inerested in a modern and democratic islamic state. They will not be easily subdued. Let us hope this don't become a Burma revisited...

A relatively stable, well-functioning Iran would be of massive importance to the entire region and could very well help cool down things in several of the surrounding countries. This could save many lives and improve the lives of countless more. Basically I think it's in our common interest that the dissenters succeed, and ultimately overthrow a corrupt regime that uses religious fanaticism as means of personal gain.

/Mac
 
Good point M4cros.

I read a book by Benjamin Franklin: An American Life by Walter Isaacson a couple of months ago. I see why he emphasized separating state and religion.
 
Good point M4cros.

I read a book by Benjamin Franklin: An American Life by Walter Isaacson a couple of months ago. I see why he emphasized separating state and religion.

The biggest "aha" moment over the state vs religion-issue I've had, was a Jack London short story I read when I was a kid. I do not remember it's name but it's fundamental meaning still remains very vivid in my memory even if it must be 15 years at least since I read it. Two outsiders came to a eskimo or indian tribe. One became chief, other sjaman. Who do you think had the real power?

Now 'ol Jack wasn't really that much of a political writer, but that short story ought to be syllabus of any social or political science-related education. It handles this age-old religion vs state on a small scale, but it illustrates the effect religious power has, if it's excercised in a political way, very clearly.

That said, I do not think we can expect a more democratic Iran to sever the ties between religion and state. A secular Iran, in the same way that Turky is, seems unlikely. Yet maybe, with a strong leader, the state will have the upper hand, and not the religious leaders.

/Mac
 
Under the Shah's Iran, the feared secret police helped to keep dissent under control. Today, under the theocracy, you have these roving armed militias, which in the past week or so are snatching people from their homes in the middle of the night, beating them senseless (or to death) and then dragging them away.

I heard last night that the government told the families that they could check on the status of their loved ones in a month.

How much has life changed?

Dictators don't change much, whether they wear a suit, uniform or a robe.
 
Last edited:
I do see some parallels, but what strikes me most about Iran is the sheer number of women fighting for their rights too.

I noticed this too. I thought it very important, but I can't say that I've seen anyone mention it other than you. I remember Persian friends talking about the Iran-Iraq War as a time of women, because so many young men were killed (Iran lost over 1 million people in that conflict in total casualties, roughly 3/4 of that number being men of fighting age.) The hard-liners in Iran are seen as responsible for that war, and perhaps the memory of that period of time lingers strongly among women who lost fathers and brothers. Add to that the (not inconsequential) issue of gender inequity and the economic hardships that inequity creates for women specifically, they may see most clearly both the failure and cost of this government's ongoing obsession with a foreign policy that is wrecking the economy.

I don't know, but I did think it was very interesting.

edit: Of course, the role of Faezeh Hashemi in the opposition protests, who is Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's daughter (the former president noted and curiously/carefully complimented in Ayatollah Khamenei's speech the other day,) may also be a motivating influence for women.
 
Last edited:
Actually Jack London was quite a political writer and, "gasp," a socialist one at that. He wrote a great anti-fascist screed called The Iron Heel.

I don't call that politics, I call it "common sense" :p You are correct however, it's been many years since I went through his complete works, don't remember all of it. I appologize for my somewhat slappdash definition of him as a non-political writer.

/Mac
 
We should rightfully and righteously condemn dictatorships and oppression wherever they occur. But given the record (past and present) of the world's "democracies," we should always bring a measure of humility and self-reflection to our analyses and critiques.
 
I'm thankful that I live in this true democracy in which change of power occurs peacefully although not without discord or anger. I'm glad that I don't live in a "democracy" in which the Supreme Leader announces the results of an election before polls have even closed.
 
Back
Top Bottom