Skiff
Well-known
Marty, I can understand your point of view. Thom Hogan has discussed that for about 15 years now, again and again
. He has always critizised Nikon for being not active enough in the special DX lens segment for their APS-C cameras.And it looks like a correct assessment.
But interestingly the Nikon customers have probably seen that differently, as about 85-90% of all sold Nikon DSLRs have been crop-sensor APS-C models!
If Nikon customers would have considered the Nikon lens line as insufficient, Nikon APS-C cameras would not have been so successful.
And by the way, Canon wasn't more active in this lens segment, too.
But Pentax has been, with lots of (excellent) dedicated lenses for the APS-C format. So the new Pentax K3 Mark III can rely on a huge lens base, from 11 to 560mm focal length.
Last edited:
Skiff
Well-known
FWIW, Pentax did dip their toes in the mirrorless market, so they did “go mirrorless”, twice. And both cameras were soon discontinued.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentax_K-01
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentax_Q_series
I know, but I was referring to the Pentax strategy for the future: And they were absolutely clear in several official statements last year that their strategy is to focus on (D)SLR technology.
And that is clever and the best they can do.
Skiff
Well-known
So, is it a good viewfinder or not? You guys have confused me!
There are already some initial reviews of the K3 Mark III out there.
Because Pentax has given several units (but without the final firmware, but with the final hardware = also final OVF) two months ago to several photographers.
They all report the same: This completely newly designed OVF is excellent, and probably the best of all APS-C cameras.
An OVF on FF OVF level. That is amazing.
Freakscene
Obscure member
The sensor and the viewfinder are independent. If you measure the viewfinder characteristics, as opposed to accepting manufacturer data, you’ll find that the horizontal coverage is not the same as vertical, that is why it makes a lot of difference how it is measured. If it has been calculated by area, however, you can trust the measurement. But manufacturers and reviewers rarely tell you.
So, is it a good viewfinder or not? You guys have confused me!
I am reliably told that K-3 III viewfinder is by far the best APS viewfinder in an SLR. But the details are important, and more factors than coverage will be relevant to its performance. Pentax claim excellent manual focus characteristics, generally a weak point of autofocus SLRs because their focus screens are a welded section of light piping fibre optic cables with their own microlenses on each end. It is also a problem with APS format viewfinders because they are smaller, but the K-3 III offers promise here because it is larger.
What I am saying is don’t believe numbers alone - the visual experience of looking through the viewfinder is very, very important and can’t be entirely characterised by a small range of numbers, and the numbers are increasingly misused and unreliably presented.
Marty
And I’m much too interested in this camera, and am jabbering like an idiot to divert my own interest . . .
olakiril
Well-known
In mirrorless cameras yes, but in (D)SLRs of course not. The size of the mirror (that usually matches the sensor size) is what primarily determines the magnification of the viewfinder (measured with an equivalent FF 50mm FoV). The lenses before and after the pentaprism/pentamirror usually don't increase the magnification by a large degree as it can degrade the image, and are mostly there to optimize the eye relief.
Here is a link with the effective sizes of the viewfinders for different cameras:
https://www.neocamera.com/article/viewfinder_sizes
The numbers that Pentax states (1.05x magnification) and the ones DpReview mentions (.68x equivalent), are pretty close and I see no reason to doubt them.
But as you say, the quality of the OVF depends on other factors as well.
I was joking... but thank you.
Freakscene
Obscure member
The mirror determines coverage - the % measure that is the proportion of the full frame displayed in the viewfinder. This is why coverage can be greater in one axis than the other, and why linear, diagonal and area measures of coverage are rarely the same, because if you measure the mirror it often has different proportional measurements to the sensor or film frame. The mirror has nothing to do with magnification, which is the relative size of the visual image to the aereal image cast by the mirror. Magnification is controlled by the pentaprism and whatever else is in the optical path.
I’m going to leave this now. Goodnight/day.
Marty
Skiff
Well-known
Meanwhile the camera is available and out there in the shops.
And the first pictures and reviews from buyers / users are online.
Wow, the performance is really impressive! It looks like one of the best ILCs ever made so far:
- outstanding picture quality on current FF level (and that as an APS-C camera)
- impressive viewfinder on FF quality level
- excellent build quality
- excellent rear display
- perfect ergonomics
- significantly improved autofocus.
I have never been a big fan of the APS-C format. But with such a camera, I could get weak..........
Pentax is back!!
And the first pictures and reviews from buyers / users are online.
Wow, the performance is really impressive! It looks like one of the best ILCs ever made so far:
- outstanding picture quality on current FF level (and that as an APS-C camera)
- impressive viewfinder on FF quality level
- excellent build quality
- excellent rear display
- perfect ergonomics
- significantly improved autofocus.
I have never been a big fan of the APS-C format. But with such a camera, I could get weak.........
.Pentax is back!!
agentlossing
Well-known
Meanwhile the camera is available and out there in the shops.
And the first pictures and reviews from buyers / users are online.
Wow, the performance is really impressive! It looks like one of the best ILCs ever made so far:
- outstanding picture quality on current FF level (and that as an APS-C camera)
- impressive viewfinder on FF quality level
- excellent build quality
- excellent rear display
- perfect ergonomics
- significantly improved autofocus.
I have never been a big fan of the APS-C format. But with such a camera, I could get weak.........
Pentax is back!!
My philosophy is that, if there's an APS-C DSLR that is worth being interested in, Pentax is the one, because of the small and unique DA Limited primes. My dislike of APS-C format is mostly due to the way lens focal lengths are still often stuck in FF terms, i.e. 24, 35, 50... lenses which make more sense on FF formats. Pentax has unique lenses like the 15, 21, 40, 70 limiteds which are unique focal lengths that work really well.