Pentax Screw-Mount Lenses: Optical Treasures in Plain Sight

Pentax Screw-Mount Lenses: Optical Treasures in Plain Sight
Asahi Optical Co made superb lenses but fell short on promoting them

By Jason Schneider

Asahi Optical Co. (the name means “rising sun”) was founded as Asahi Kogaku Goshi Kaisha in 1919 by Kumao Kajiwara in the Tokyo suburb of Toshima, and the shop began producing eyeglass lenses. In 1938 it changed its name to Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., and by that time it was making camera and cine lenses, devoting much if its energy producing optical instruments under contract for the Japanese military. The company was disbanded under the occupation, permitted to re-form in 1948, and resumed manufacturing binoculars and camera lenses, supplying the latter to such renowned companies as Konishiroku (Konica) and Chiyoda Kogaku Seiko (Minolta). In 1952 Asahi introduced the Asahiflex, the first Japanese 35mm SLR, which had a waist-level finder and a 37mm threaded lens mount, and in 1954 brought forth the Asahiflex IIB, the first Japanese SLR with an instant-return mirror. In 1957 Asahi acquired the name “Pentax” from East German Zeiss (VEB) and began producing Pentax 35mm SLRS using the larger M-42 screw mount that had been pioneered on the DDR-made Contax D and Praktica SLRs. The “Takumar” name used on most M-42-mount Pentax lenses honors Takuma Kajiwara, the brother of the company founder and a well-known fine arts painter in Japan.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	76.0 KB ID:	4792666

Asahiflex IIB of 1954, first Japanese SLR with instant return mirror, with superb 58mm f/2.4 Takumar lens in 37mm screw mount. Note auxiliary optical finder.

Asahi Optical Co. always made excellent lenses, including the 37mm screw-mount line designed for the Asahiflexes, but unlike Nikon and Canon they never aggressively promoted them—with one exception we’ll get to later. Asahi adopted the 42mm diameter M-42 x 1mm pitch lens mount in 1957, for the successful Asahi Pentax (AP), and introduced the semi-auto-diaphragm feature in the Auto-Takumar lenses for the Asahi Pentax K. The company continued using the M-42 mount in the well-received S- and H-series Pentaxes and in the hugely successful Spotmatics. The original Pentax Spotmatic of 1964 was the first 35mm SLR with a through-the-lens (TTL) light meter to top the sales charts, though the Topcon RE Super had its own version of this feature a year earlier. Aside from the light meter, which was powered by a 1.35-volt mercury cell, the Spotmatic was entirely mechanical. A small switch on the left side of the lens housing was pushed up to stop down the lens and activate the meter; the exposure controls would then be adjusted to center a needle along the right-hand edge of the viewfinder. The system became the workhorse of many professionals at that time.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	56.4 KB ID:	4792668

Asahi Pentax AP of 1957, the first Pentax and first with an M-42 mount, is shown with a 5.8cm f:2.4 Takumar lens. It was also sold by Sears as the Tower 26.

Asahi Optical Co. 42mm Screw-Mount Lenses in Brief

The first series of Auto-Takumar lenses of the late ‘50s and early ‘60s made prior to the introduction of the Pentax Spotmatic have a spring- loaded aperture stop-down mechanism that must be manually re-cocked after each exposure by pushing a little tab until it clicks, opening the lens to maximum aperture. Then, when you press the shutter release the lens stops down to whatever aperture you’ve selected just before the shutter fires. Lenses originally supplied with Pentax Model K and Model S cameras have this feature.

Super-Takumar lenses have a single spring-loaded aperture stop-down pin on the back that’s pushed in by a metal tab inside the camera at the base if the mount--it pops out to contact the pin when the shutter is released. This automatic stop-down system automatically re-opens the lens to maximum aperture after the exposure and requires no re-cocking. However, there is a milled tab at the rear of the lens barrel that can be set to Auto or Man (manual), the latter position stopping the lens down to the set aperture for assessing depth of field, etc. Both Auto- and Super-Takumar lenses without any other identification markings are single layer coated.

Super-Multi-Coated Takumar lenses that debuted on the Pentax Electro-Spotmatic (ES) of 1971 are multicoated, which improves light transmission and minimizes ghosting and flare. They provide full aperture metering, and because the lens has an extra prong that transmits the pre-selected aperture value to the camera, it’s sometimes called Pentax ES mount. Super-Multi-Coated Takumar lenses are fully compatible with the Pentax ES II, Spotmatic F, and all stop-down-metering Pentaxes, but problems may arise with non-Pentax cameras that use the M-42 mount. Lenses marked SMC Takumar introduced with the Pentax ES II in 1972 have minor cosmetic differences but are functionally equivalent to those marked Super-Multi-Coated.

Fascinating factoid: While Nikon and Zeiss had been multi-coating specific lenses for many years, neither company ever mentioned it prominently or used multicoating as a marketing tool and Asahi did—a rare instance of lens marketing savvy for a company that largely hid its light under a bushel. Asahi’s SMC coating was also judged to be the best in the business, as tested by Popular Photography, among others.

In general, Asahi Optical Co., later Pentax Corporation, produced outstanding lenses with remarkable consistency and few, if any, can be rightly called “dogs.” Even Nikon and Canon couldn’t match this incredible uniformity of optical excellence, though Tokyo Optical Co. (Topcon) could and did. As a result, there are now many amazing bargains in used screw-mount Takumar and Pentax SMC lenses out there that are readily adaptable to digital capture with full frame mirrorless and DSLR cameras, and of course a huge variety of 35mm SLRs including models by Ricoh, Fuji, (early) Olympus, Praktica, Cosina, and scads of other brands. Obviously, we can’t describe every single one of them here, so we’ll do the next best thing and give you a selection of worthy examples that we’ve known and loved. All the lenses listed below deliver impressive sharpness and detail and most, as noted, provide beautifully smooth “vintage” rendition and pleasing bokeh.

A Sensational Selection of Superb M-42 mount Takumar Lenses

Normal lenses:

50mm f/1.4 Super-Takumar (8-element variant): widely acclaimed for its outstanding sharpness, gorgeous rendition, and beautiful bokeh, this coveted lens commands premium prices in the $200-$350 range. It’s identifiable by its protruding rear element with its glass edges visible, an aperture stop-down switch marked A-M rather than “Auto Man,” and an infrared focus mark to the right of an open “4 “on the DOF scale. The design includes a cemented triplet of elements 4,5, and 6 that is very difficult and expensive to manufacture, which is why it was superseded by the 7-element version, which is also a great lens but a tad less sharp wide open and off axis at its widest apertures.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	39.5 KB ID:	4792671

The coveted 8-element version of the 50mm f/1.4 Super-Takumar lens is identifiable by its protruding rear element that sticks out beyond the retaining ring.

50mm f/1.4 Super-Takumar (7-element version): Far more common than the 8-element version, this 7-element, 6-group lens was also made in Super-Multi-Coated and SMC variants and has its IR focusing mark to the left of the numeral 4 on the DOF scale. It’s a great lens, prized for its excellent sharpness and smooth bokeh, and it focuses down to 0.45m. It performs as well or better than equivalent high speed normal from Nikon and Canon and it’s a bargain that you can usually snag for under 100 bucks, and sometimes a lot less than that.


rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	63.6 KB ID:	4792673
50mm f/1.4 Super-Takumar lens in black: This is the standard 7-element version, an outstanding high-speed normal prime , and a great value.

55mm f/1,8 Super-Takumar: Also available in Auto-Takumar, Super-Multi-Coated Takumar, and SMC Pentax version, it’s the sleeper of the line—a truly great 6-element, 5-group double Gauss design that delivers outstanding sharpness even wide open, beautiful bokeh, and amazing value for the money. Starting in 1965 on it incorporates a least one radioactive element made of thorium glass. Depending on the variant it focuses down to 0.55 or 0.45m. It’s quite compact and lightweight at 6.1 ounces, and you can snag one for a paltry $50-$100!

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	47.3 KB ID:	4792674

55mm f/1.8 Super-Takumar delivers exceptional imaging performance in a handy light-weight package and it's readily available at bargain prices.

Medium tele and tele lenses

85mm f/1.8 Auto-Takumar/ Super-Multi-Coated Takumar: Prized for its outstanding optical correction, incredible sharpness, and smooth, natural bokeh, this beauty came in 5-element, 4-group, and 6-element 6-group versions, and has one of the highest user favorability ratings of any Asahi Optical Co. lens and is priced accordingly. Depending on the version it has either a 9-bladed or 8-bladed diaphragm, focuses down to 33.5 inches frame filling headshots, and weighs in at a portable 12.4 ounces. Despite its relatively high used price of $300-$350 it’s noteworthy that most purchasers consider it a great value.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	46.2 KB ID:	4792676

85mm f/1.8 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar delivers impressive performance, speed, and gorgeous rendition, but it's highly prized and pretty pricey.

85mm f/1.9 Super-Multi-Coated and Super-Takumar: The two versions of this outstand medium tele differ only in the coating—both are based on the same 5-element, 4-group optical formula. In terms of sharpness, they’re both excellent, with ratings a tad lower than the 85mm f/1.8, but with the same gorgeous bokeh. When shooting wide open there’s a bit of softness due to under-corrected chromatic aberrations, but this can yield attractive effects in portraiture. Stopping down to f/2.8 noticeably improves sharpness and by f/4 it delivers crisp definition across the entire mage field. Deciding between this lens and the 85mm f/1.8 may well boil down to condition and price, and which imaging characteristics you prefer. Current price range: $300-$350.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	0 Size:	43.0 KB ID:	4792678

85mm f/1.9 Super-Takumar: It isn't as sharp wide open as the 85mm f/1.8, but it's a superb portrait tele with gobs of character and crisp when stopped down

105mm f/2.8 Super-Takumar and Super-Multi-Coated Takumar: The very first version of Asahi’s 105mm f/2.8 Takumar had a pre-set manual diaphragm and was a high quality 4-element Tessar type. All 5 subsequent versions employ a classic 5-element 4-group optical formula that’s similar but not identical to the 85mm f/1.9. While there are cosmetic variations in external finish and differences in coating, all but the first 105 performs at about the same level as the 85mm f/1.9, delivering outstanding sharpness across the field by f/4 and smooth, attractive, natural bokeh at f/2.8 – f5.6 If you favor the 105mm Leica/Nikon-inspired 105mm portrait tele focal length and can live with a minimum focusing distance of 1.2 meters (just under 4 feet), any one of the auto diaphragm versions is an excellent choice. Icing on the cake: you can snag one of these beauties for under 100 bucks.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

105mm f/2.8 Super-Takumar: It's a lovely portrait tele that lacks the pizzazz and speed if its 85mm counterparts, but it's very sharp and amazingly low priced.

135mm f/2.5 Super-Takumar and Super-Multi-Coated Takumar: This fast moderate telephoto is acclaimed for its outstanding sharpness and smooth, beautiful bokeh. Highly rated by users, older Super-Takumar versions employ a 5-element, 4-group optical formula, and later SMC versions use a 6-element, 6-grouop version that was carried over in the K-mount version not included here. All versions stop down to f/22 and have a minimum focusing distance of 4 feet, 11 inches (a maximum magnification of 0.11x) which is not sufficient for close-up portraits. However, its wide f/2.5 aperture enables extended control of depth of field for creative effects. Best news: You can acquire a clean M-42 mount example (any type) for about $100-$150.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

135mm f/2.5 Super-Takumar is acclaimed for its outstanding sharpness and gorgeous rendition, This is the older 5-element version, but either one is a winner.

Ultra-wide and wide-angle lenses

17mm f/4 Super Fish-Eye Takumar and S-M-C Takumar: This remarkable 11-element, 7-group lens provides 180-degree coverage on full-frame film or digital cameras, stops down to f/22, and focuses down to 7.9 inches. It delivers exceptional imaging performance for a lens of this type, with excellent sharpness, and high user ratings, but as expected falls short on bokeh, which is not the strong suit of fish-eye lenses. If you’ve always hankered for a high quality, reasonable fast fish-eye lens, it's a bargain at $200-$350 for a clean example (any type).

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

17mm f/4 Super-Multi-Coated Fish-Eye Takumar is a fantastic 180-degree fish-eye that's faster and sharper than most of its ilk, but it's no bokeh monster.

20mm f/4.5 Super-Takumar, S-M-C Takumar: A highly regarded ultra-wide, this 11-element, 10-group beauty provides 94-degree coverageon the full frame format, stops down to f/16, and has a minimum focusing distance of 7.9 inches (0.13x magnification). It delivers exceptional sharpness for a lens of this type, and very nice bokeh for an ultra-wide-angle lens. Highly praised by users, it weighs in at about 8.8 ounces (with slight variations depending on version) and is judged to be a great value by an overwhelming majority of reviewers. It’s readily available used at $200-$300 in excellent to near mint condition.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

20mm f/4.5 Super-Takumar provides 94-degree coverage and is amazingly sharp for an ultra-wide. Few lenses of this type deliver more beautiful bokeh.

24mm f/3.5 Super-Takumar, S-M-C Takumar: A great all-rounder, this 9-element, 8-group classic provides excellent sharpness and attractive bokeh in a compact, lightweight package (about 8.8 ounces). It provides 84-degree diagonal coverage on the full frame format, focuses down to 9.8 inches, and stops down to f/16. Recommended by 92% of reviewers, it’s a great deal at the current asking price of $100-150 in clean, fully functional condition.

35mm f/2 Super-Takumar, S-M-C Takumar: Prized for its speed, this high-performance, wide-angle employs a classic 8-element, 7-group design (in all but the earliest examples, which used an 8-element 5-group design). It delivers very good central sharpness with a touch of flare wide open, is crisp and contrasty across the field by f/5.6 and has nice bokeh at its widest apertures. It stops down to f/16, focuses down to 17.7 inches (some versions get down to 16 inches), and is recommended by 90% of users. An excellent choice in a fast, full frame wide angle clean examples are readily available at the leading online auction sites at prices in the $150-$250 range.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

Black Pentax Spotmatic with 35mm f/2 Super-Takumar: A great combo for low light street shooting and the asking price was only $299--a pretty good deal.

Macro lenses

50mm f/4 Super Macro-Takumar, S-M-C Takumar: It’s just a little ol’ 4-element 3-group Tessar design, but it delivers exceptional imaging performance at both macro and normal shooting distances. This relatively compact beauty focuses down to 9.1 inches (0.5x or half life-size magnification), though the earliest pre-set version of the Macro-Takumar gets down to 1:1 without extension tubes! Either version delivers amazing sharpness even wide open, is critically sharp across the field by f/5.6 down to its minimum aperture f f/22 (f/32 in later examples), and has a 5-bladed diaphragm. Later versions weigh in at about 8.8 ounces; the earliest versions are about 15g heavier. An astounding 100% of users highly recommend this lens. Current online listings cover a wide price range from under $100 to a little over $200. It’s a winner!
rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699
50mm f/4 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar is a little jewel and it performs exceptionally well at both macro and normal shooting distances.

100mm f/4 Macro-Takumar, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar: Based on a classic 5 element, 3-group Heliar design, this versatile short tele macro is extremely sharp even wide open, delivers exceptionally smooth, natural bokeh, and focuses down to 17.7 inches (half life-size). Robustly constructed, it’s 3.2 inches long, 2.6 inches in diameter, weighs in at 12.3 inches, stops down to f/22, and has a 6-bladed diaphragm. Like its 50mm macro counterpart, it’s recommended by 100% of the eviewers who assessed it! Highly recommended, and reasonably priced at about $100-$200 based on current auction listings.

rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	rs=w:1440,h:1440.jpg Views:	109 Size:	59.0 KB ID:	4792699

100mm f/4 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar is one off the best performing medium tele macro lenses ever made and it's robustly constructed and rugged.
 
I have never come across a bad takumar lens, not even in terms of sample variations. Although I tried both the Super-Multi-Coated and the single coated versions, I somehow prefer the single coated ones, the build quality of them is exquisite.

Actually I have this one loaded with some HP5 and taking it out tomorrow.

20220709_214604.jpg
 
I have never come across a bad takumar lens, not even in terms of sample variations. Although I tried both the Super-Multi-Coated and the single coated versions, I somehow prefer the single coated ones, the build quality of them is exquisite.

Actually I have this one loaded with some HP5 and taking it out tomorrow.

I agree. Takumar lenses are consistently excellent and the non-multicoated versions have very nice, smooth rendition. Having said that SMC coating is among the best and it can help, especially with ultra-wides. Good shooting with your well brassed classic!
 
Does anybody have a primary source for the Pentacon + Contax = Pentax story? Pentacon selling the Pentax name to Asahi is one of those things I've seen mentioned here and there for years, but what's the actual source of the story? Has it ever been confirmed by Pentax, or by Pentacon?

I've been curious about the relationship between the companies for a while, since as well, one has to consider the automatic aperture plunger. I assume Pentacon simply didn't patent it, allowing Pentax in the East and Wirgin in the West to adopt it. There was nothing in the M42 mount in and of itself that was patentable, but the aperture plunger is a different matter. If pentacon did patent it, then surely Asahi would've had to work something out with them to use it on their cameras. It has also always been a curiosity that Wirgin's implementation on the Edixa reflex cameras differed in its tolerances, most Japanese lenses will not work properly on the Edixa cameras, for two reasons: 1, the thread on the Edixa mount starts a few degrees further clockwise than on Praktica and Pentax cameras, and 2, the aperture plunger on the Edixa cameras (up until the very last examples) does not extend out as far as those used on Praktica and Pentax cameras. The result being that Edixa cameras won't usually operate the auto-aperture plunger on Japanese lenses (strangely though, they usually still work on East German lenses!).

As for marketing, though Pentax didn't really market to the professional photographer, but if you look at photos of press photographers from the 70s, you'll usually see as many Pentax Spotmatics in the crowd as you see Nikon Fs.
 
Exif-JPEG-PICTURE.jpg


This Pentax 85/4.5 is one step above an APO lens, The Pentax is an Ultra-achromat, corrected for four wavelenghts- ranging from UV through to near IR.
Uncoated Optics. This lens was very expensive 50 years ago, around $1500 or so.
 
Great write up. Always enjoy your expositions on camera history. Re: Pentax M42 lenses, i always found myself preferring CZJ MC lenses over Pentax, as the results tend to be more pleasant and "unique." It's hard to put the difference into words, though.
 
Does anybody have a primary source for the Pentacon + Contax = Pentax story? Pentacon selling the Pentax name to Asahi is one of those things I've seen mentioned here and there for years, but what's the actual source of the story? Has it ever been confirmed by Pentax, or by Pentacon?

I've been curious about the relationship between the companies for a while, since as well, one has to consider the automatic aperture plunger. I assume Pentacon simply didn't patent it, allowing Pentax in the East and Wirgin in the West to adopt it. There was nothing in the M42 mount in and of itself that was patentable, but the aperture plunger is a different matter. If pentacon did patent it, then surely Asahi would've had to work something out with them to use it on their cameras. It has also always been a curiosity that Wirgin's implementation on the Edixa reflex cameras differed in its tolerances, most Japanese lenses will not work properly on the Edixa cameras, for two reasons: 1, the thread on the Edixa mount starts a few degrees further clockwise than on Praktica and Pentax cameras, and 2, the aperture plunger on the Edixa cameras (up until the very last examples) does not extend out as far as those used on Praktica and Pentax cameras. The result being that Edixa cameras won't usually operate the auto-aperture plunger on Japanese lenses (strangely though, they usually still work on East German lenses!).

As for marketing, though Pentax didn't really market to the professional photographer, but if you look at photos of press photographers from the 70s, you'll usually see as many Pentax Spotmatics in the crowd as you see Nikon Fs.

This website has a reference to "Pentax" being a German trademark - in section 3 https://www.dresdner-kameras.de/contax/contax.html
 
This website has a reference to "Pentax" being a German trademark - in section 3 https://www.dresdner-kameras.de/contax/contax.html

The timeline is what puzzles me. Did Asahi plan to market a "Pentax" and find the name already trademarked, and consequently moved to buy it out? Or was somebody at Asahi already aware of the prototype East German Pentax (a medium format SLR) and made a move to purchase the name preemptively? It's always seemed like a strange situation to me, since why would Asahi want the Pentax name to start with?
 
…why would Asahi want the Pentax name to start with?
A possibility is that they wanted a name that did not sound Japanese. Sad to say, but as a kid even I experienced this attitude from people in the 1960’s: there still was animosity towards the Japanese and their products were considered cheap and inferior. Certainly so in the 1950’s. Although Japanese cameras earned their rightful respect among pros in the late 1950’s and the 1960’s, the general American public didn’t associate Japanese products with quality until the 1970’s when Toyota et al kicked Detroit’s butt.

Anyway, Takumar lenses seem to have universal respect and deservedly so. Here is my first, a 55/2 Super Takumar on the SP500, an 8-element 50/1.4 on the H3v, and a collection of 28, 35, 105, 135, and 300 Takumars. To me, the heft, feel, and smoothness of operation of these lenses is unsurpassed.

The silver-barreled lens in the foreground is a 40/2.8 Kilfitt Makro Kilar D lens in M42 mount. 1:1 reproduction ratio. Unbelievably sharp and with beautiful bokeh. I have a custom-fitted Post-It note affixed to it to prevent it from being focused further than 30cm with the SP500 due to the rear element interfering with the mirror. On a Spotmatic it’s ok.

Click image for larger version  Name:	AA6E29D0-2062-47A4-A63D-61D346091AC2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	261.3 KB ID:	4792865 Click image for larger version  Name:	B6A3CEAF-C60D-46A0-B603-9FE6D98C7D66.jpg Views:	0 Size:	333.8 KB ID:	4792866
 
Yes, these are great lenses -- I have a selection of the Super-Multi-Coated and later SMC Takumars. Optically superb, beautifully made, and compact too. I am not really a fan of the stop-down Pentaxes (though I know those tend to be considered the classic ones), but I love the full-aperture metering cameras -- Spotmatic F, ES and ES II. Not as smooth in operation as, say, a Canon FTb or Konica T3, but they get the job done and are reliable.
 
Exif-JPEG-PICTURE.jpg


This Pentax 85/4.5 is one step above an APO lens, The Pentax is an Ultra-achromat, corrected for four wavelenghts- ranging from UV through to near IR.
Uncoated Optics. This lens was very expensive 50 years ago, around $1500 or so.

Wow, apparently only 40 are known to have been sold !!
 
Wow, apparently only 40 are known to have been sold !!

It is a rare lens- more were sold for use in Scientific Equipment like Optical Spectrum Analyzers than for photography.

Of course the Temptation becomes "I have the hard to fine lens, might as well collect them all". The first Nikon RF that I "stumbled into" was the S4, some 25+ years ago. Marked in Feet, about 10% were.

As far as Japan and Quality: Sears sold many Japanese Cameras, especially the Nicca and Nikkor lenses.
After David Douglas Duncan's "This is War" was published, The quality of Japanese photographic equipment was well established. Reminds me of another Pop Photo article, "How the West was Won".
 
Exif-JPEG-PICTURE.jpg


This Pentax 85/4.5 is one step above an APO lens, The Pentax is an Ultra-achromat, corrected for four wavelenghts- ranging from UV through to near IR.
Uncoated Optics. This lens was very expensive 50 years ago, around $1500 or so.

Asahi Pentax was well into product placement for their gear and in the 1967 production of that year's James Bond extravaganza "You Only Live Twice" in one scene Pentax lenses were front and centre (together with some Sony kit - a miniature TV.) At first I thought the more exotic of the two lenses shown (the other being a 50mm f1.4) was the 85mm f4.5 Ultra Achromatic lens but on tracking down the scene from the movie it turned out to be the equally or perhaps even more rare 85mm f3.5 Quartz Takumar. Apparently the product placement fee must have been high though as I have been told that if you look even closer at other scenes also shot in the same sports car in those scenes other, less exotic Takumars are shown in place of the Quartz Takumar.

Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85mm F4.5 Reviews - M42 Screwmount Telephoto Primes - Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database (pentaxforums.com)


HmBDbV1.jpg
 
Great article! I've always been a Pentaxian first and by extension a big fan of Takumars. Optically they're great, and the fit and finish is simply wonderful. The focussing action on a clean Tak is the best I've used from any lens manufacturer.

The Super Takumar 28/f3.5, 55/f1.8 and 105/f2.8 are all excellent, compact, abundant and CHEAP! Combined with a Spotmatic or, even better, an earlier S-series body makes one of the classiest mechanical SLR systems around.


Asahi Pentax S, Takumar 55/f2.2 and 135/f3.5 (both pre-set)


AP-S and the Takumar 35/f4. This was the first Japanese wide-angle SLR lens* and was only made from 1957-59

*According to some…


Pentax SV, Super Takumar 50/f1.4 (8-element) and Portra400
 
I always thought the Fujita 2.5/35 was the first Japanese made retrofocus lens, but looking now it seems there is some debate over this. Both Fujita and Asahi released their 35mm lenses in 1957, but I can't find definitive details on which actually hit the market first.
 
Screw-mount Takumars are a joy to use. The 17mm f/4 Super Fish-Eye is a very interesting lens. There are no filter threads on the lens. I believe that's due to the curved front element. But there are three internal filters (UV, Y2, O2).



Wonderful photo nickthetasmaniac!
 
I always thought the Fujita 2.5/35 was the first Japanese made retrofocus lens, but looking now it seems there is some debate over this. Both Fujita and Asahi released their 35mm lenses in 1957, but I can't find definitive details on which actually hit the market first.

Pentax folklore holds that the Takumar was the first. I think Gerjan also makes this claim in his screwmount guide. However I have no idea what the primary source of the claim is!
 
I'm a little wary of Pentax "firsts" as fans claim some things for Pentax, that are very obviously not true. For instance, it's widely claimed online that the Pentax AP was the first 35mm SLR with a right-handed lever advance, even though the Wirgin Edixa Reflex had already been in production with one for two years by that point -and isn't even an obscure camera, so there's no question about it. Even the Cameraquest page on the original Pentax still makes this claim despite it being obviously untrue.

I decided to do a cursory search of Japanese language pages, and did not find a single one that addressed the question of Fujita vs. Takumar directly, but on the whole it seems there are more that credit Fujita than Asahi. One page however points out that in 1957 Topcon also introduced a retrofocus lens, so perhaps there is an even more often overlooked contender. In 1958 it seems the whole industry came forward with 35mm SLR lenses, whilst in '57 there were only three Japanese 35mm lenses available for SLRs.
 
The Super-Tak 55/1.8 has been one of my favorite normal lenses since I acquired it. Recently I picked up a similar era (mid-60s) 55/2. I ran some side-by-side tests on my mirrorless camera with speed booster, in a dark room with some flash and LED lights. The info on the Pentaxforums indicates that my two copies are probably radioactive (not all are). Many of my Takumars have a yellowish hue, but my 55/2 has less yellowing than my 55/1.8, and perhaps because of this, it has better light transmission. It also seems sharper at f4 than my 55/1.8. I've seen some analysis that suggests the optics are identical on these two lenses, and the 55/2 just has an aperture ring that prevents it from opening up to 1.8. In any case, I had intended to sell this 55/2 with the Spotmatic SP II it came with, but but now I think not. I'm trying to sell a different lens to make room. For film in particular, some of the lenses that were (and still are) lower cost are really just as good as the more expensive versions, if you don't need the wide open aperture very often.
 
Back
Top Bottom