Thank you all for your comments.
- Yes, it is definitely an avocado ... It was under an avocado tree, and if I posted the full-size image, that it is an avocado is instantly recognizable.
- I agree, this one needs a big-ish print to work well, 11x17 inch works better than my usual 9x12.
- The existence of the debris in the picture is a personal choice. Brushing it away would further pull the photograph into a more abstractive space but detracts somewhat, to me, from it being "found art." To me, found art does not allow for preparing the subject that way; the interaction of what is visually abstract with visually documentarian and representational is one of the tensions in this genre of photographs that I enjoy. Whether I got the balance right for you, of course, is always up to you to decide. (I'm sure I've gotten it wrong for me in 13 out of 17 attempts...! 🙂
Likewise how centered or decentered the avocado might be. I like in this photo how the avocado is rotated with respect to the tile that it is on, which itself is vaguely reminiscent of an avocado in shape, and which is included in a set with four other tiles that altogether also appear to be reminiscent of an avocado shape at yet another slight rotation.
What's interesting to me is that I certainly didn't see all these geometries when I first took the photo. I saw something in it, and began seeing the layers of it afterwards when I breezed back and forth over the photos made on that walk in editing and curating the set. When I look back on the original set again today, I see yet different things.
Fun stuff. 🙂
G