Portraits - critique please!

[chilohm]

Here are some portraits I have done recently. Advice and critique welcomed.

I shot these on a Contax G2 with various lenses on to Kodak Portra 160VC and HP5+

1. Sadie eating

2. Max

3, Emily

4. Hazel

5. Lorcan in drag

6. Amy and Sadie

7. Christina 1

8. Christina 2

 

[Rogrund]

Great portraits all of them, I like #1 most.

 

[Mackinaw]

I like the first the best but think it needs more contrast. On the other hand, some of the color shots are too contrasty for my tastes (highlights burnt out). Like the last one too.

Jim B.

 

[chilohm]

Thank you all. I really appreciate your feedback and would love more.
I'll have a think about contrast...

 

[P. Lynn Miller]

I do not know if you are shooting digital or film. But you are pushing too much contrast and the appears to be signs of over-sharpening.

But I do like the poses and expressions, so you have done well with your directing, just need to get the light under better control.

No. 6 is my pick, light is good, and the poses and expressions are fun and light-hearted.

 

[Ron (Netherlands)]

excellent!

 

[chilohm]

Thanks. I am shooting film. I agree they have come out very contrasty. It's really useful to get other peoples' opinions!
Jack.

 

[P. Lynn Miller]

What film are you using, unless you are shooting transparencies, then you are being let down on the scanning/printing, as most negative film and B&W if exposed properly will have the latitude to handle this amount of contrast. In almost every photo the highlights are blown and the shadows quite blocked. If you are serious about doing portraits you may want to consider getting a reflector or go the cheap route and just move your subjects into open shade to reduce the contrast.

 

[Papercut]

he lists the film used in the OP: Kodak Portra 160VC and Ilford HP5+

 

[P. Lynn Miller]

he lists the film used in the OP: Kodak Portra 160VC and Ilford HP5+

My bad! I tend to look at pictures and avoid the words.

Using Portra 160VC would explain the color photos. I would recommend using Portra NC, which would bring the highlights and shadows back under control.

 

[Papercut]

hehehe, i do the same thing many times -- easy to slide over the words when there's pretty pictures enticing the eye! 😀

 

[chilohm]

OK I'll try NC. Once again, I really appreciate the advice. I've taken pictures for years but never in a serious way. I'm getting addicted now though, so need to learn the trade!
Jack.

 

[eia41]

overall....bloody marvelous!!!

 

[oftheherd]

Interesting Keith. Number 4 and number 7 were my picks as well. Number 4 has very contrasty lighting, but it goes so well with the subject. Number 7 for the reasons you gave.

 

[P. Lynn Miller]

I really like the poses and expressions that the OP captured. My only real nitpick was the complete loss of highlights, which I actually suspect is the result of less than optimal scanning. I like portraits with 'hard-light' for dramatic effect, but you unless you are working 'high-key', you really need to keep a hold on the highlights.

I agree with Keith and others that No.s 4 & 7 are very well done, but I would reject both because of the highlight loss on the hair of lady in No. 4 and the loss of highlight on the chest and shoulders of the girl in No. 7.

Take both negatives to a good printer or scan as a positive using 48bit RGB in a good scanner and then use ColorNeg to invert and you will see the real potential of these photographs.

 

[sepiareverb]

First one is the best to my eye- I quite like the sandwich as smile thing you've got going, and how the edge of the hill goes through the ears.

 

[CK Dexter Haven]

For some reason, i can't see all of the images in the thread.

Which lens(es) did you use on 1, 5, and 7? The 90mm Sonnar?

How were these scanned? There seems to be great sharpness with minimal grain. I love #1, and #7 looks like it was shot by Bruce Weber or Tim Walker. Well done.

 

[tedwin]

To be honest.



I like the one with the *****s very much, the rest - I feel - have no merit.

 

[tedwin]

How bizarre! can't call a ***** a ***** here on RFF???

Please I am joking!! Still amused though 🙂

 

[tedwin]

shovel?


Will see if thats allowed...