"Process SFW-XL only at Seattle FilmWorks"

HLing

Well-known
Local time
10:30 PM
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
273
Location
NYC
There was a roll of a 20-exp color film ASA 200-20 DX in the newly arrived Contessamatic E. The film has 916.2 USE BY NOV. 98, and the 716820-(maybe the 916.2 goes here?) -607. Also, Process SFW-XL only at Seattle FilmWorks. I finished the roll. Now am debating whether I should try to look for more info on this, or if I should just start a new roll for testing.

Has anyone come across this film? I've read that it may or may not be movie film, which I guess will not be compatible for the C41 labs.

I'm liking the Contessamatic E so far. Hope to see some shots soon.

Thanks for your inputs!
 
I used to have some stuff from Seattle Filmworks and only once did I decide to take one roll to a regular lab. The prints came out with a strange blue tint... Good they weren't anything important!

They are no longer in business... so, in the odd case you got something out of the roll it may show not only the color cast, but also some additional color shifts or deterioration. I'd wonder if it's really worth paying for...

Take care! 🙂
 
As I recall Seattle Film Works gave out a free roll of movie film when you sent them film for processing. I found a whole heap of it when digging through an acquaintance's father's camera collection.

I read about it a while ago but don't remember the details. I think trying to have it processed at a regular C41 lab is a mean to their chemicals 🙁
 
Thanks all for your replies!

Hipsterdufus, through your link I found their facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/xxltdlab#!/xxltdlab?sk=info , which had a similar query as mine from Oct 6, but no one from the lab has updated since the beginning of August, so it seems that the flood had taken its toll.

rjbuzzclick, I thought Rodinal and diafine are for B & W only?

Anyhow, in the mean time I've started a roll of Kodak Ultramax 400 for testing the camera. Almost done with it. The mystery roll will be taken care of when the time comes....or not.
 
It's rocess-wise usually either C41 or ECN2. Developing ECN2 in a C41 machine does not make the owner happy because the rem-jet antihalation backing of the ECN2 film will leave gunk in the machine. ECN2 movie stock should be recognizable by the smaller, more rounded perforation holes, but I don't know if SFW used the same perforation for their C41 films, too.

Either way, Double Exposure Ltd. (http://xxlab.angelfire.com/) can process it.
 
ECN is close enough to C-41 that you can substitute one for the other and get scannable negatives. Consistency and archival quality might be another matter.

In my experience it is possible to small-tank develop ECN film and remove the remjet (a black antistatic scratch protect back coating) by manually scrubbing the back of your film in between wash cycles. But having it processed by a cine lab or DIY are your only options - C41 labs are generally terrified of remjet coming loose in their processor and embedding as black spots and flakes into the emulsion of dozens or hundreds of films, so they strictly reject ECN film.
 
Woah - this brings back memories. I had some of this around 1986 and shot it. If I recall correctly, SFW's appeal was that they could process the film as film, but give you slides of it. I was quite confused at the time ( and still am now at their marketing ) but all I seem to remember is that you had to send it to SFW, as no local labs would touch it.

Sorry I can't be of much help, but I hope all goes well for you.
 
Hello: No, "the flood hasn't taken its toll." That was an incident that affected us for several weeks all the way back in July 2011.

There are a lot of "unanswered questions" on our Facebook Page because we message customers with their answers directly.



I can assure you we are very open for business, and have just posted on our page that our first ECN-2 processing run of 2012 is on for sometime next week.

I know it's tempting to contribute information on a thread. But please reserve speculation when you have no basis in fact and you are affecting someone else's business.


By the way, I don't know what it is, but we love to talk on the phone. We run into quite a few people who are completely unwilling to use anything but e-mail to communicate. This if fine for a lot of things, but after a dozen of them back and forth sometimes, I really wonder if someone of these people are just trying to eat up our time.

Direct realtime contact solves so many problems and questions instantly, we're very surprised how hesitant some mail order customers are to use it.




As to ECN-2 and C-41 being "similar enough" I can assure you that's not true either. We've gotten rolls that were incorrectly labelled and crossed film processes both ways, and the colors are still printable but there's severe color shifts and I doubt the speed is optimal or the color curves. Probalby crossover in a lot of the work.

Even the CD agents aren't the same. I want to say that ECN-2 uses the same one as color paper (RA-4), so I wouldn't recommend anyone trying cross processing if you want to get A box speed, and B no color crossover or sub-standard results.


For experimentation, it's fun to try new things, however I can tell you its practically impossible to remove remjet evenly by hand.

Please "leave it to the pros," as we make little if anything on processing anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom