Turtle
Veteran
I've just come back to this. I think that in a sense 'Projects' (in the loosest sense) are unavoidable, even if the project is ourselves (which ultimately, it always is). There are patterns to what we shoot, what catches our eye and how these journeys evolve.
Projects are not necessarily shot in one go, but can coalesce over long periods of time. Understanding these patterns, rhythms, stochastic leaps in approach followed by boring deeply into individual ideas, are all part of the creative journey.
This may seem like a strong opinion, but I wonder if a person has really achieved anything (internally validated, rather than externally) if they could not bundle together some of their photographic activities under a 'project' or 'extended series' or 'book'? The alternative is to shoot randomly and I don't think that is truly possible. We can't escape our own limitations.
Projects are not necessarily shot in one go, but can coalesce over long periods of time. Understanding these patterns, rhythms, stochastic leaps in approach followed by boring deeply into individual ideas, are all part of the creative journey.
This may seem like a strong opinion, but I wonder if a person has really achieved anything (internally validated, rather than externally) if they could not bundle together some of their photographic activities under a 'project' or 'extended series' or 'book'? The alternative is to shoot randomly and I don't think that is truly possible. We can't escape our own limitations.