This tentative and discursive discussion would appear at first reading to be a post modern recapitulation and momentary derivative of Art Speak. I am acquainted w/ that language to some small degree, and look forward to joining in, to some extent, but not overly so, in such a fragmented and elliptical mode of Photo Speak if you will.
Compositional variances will be of some concern, as always, and there is certainly the expressive risk of two interrelated yet completely separate planes of linear modality intersecting within the frame work of diacritical thought, yet wholly owing to said variances, a compromise or breakthrough could occur in the photographer's work. If the photographer, or a light pole in Dadaesque surreal symbolism (sic), senses that the subject is attempting to voice their freedom of expressive actions through varying degrees of linear activity not unrelated to the ad hoc pictorial realm, then we MUST sense that something has fundamentally changed vis a vis the inner eye's non truthful projection onto the inner consciousness of desire(s).
Or, where's the Ripple and Velvitta, and what the hell kind of art opening is this?
Brad F, he da Man! I bow to the master. Thanks for the link, my eyes are about to fal out of my head reading the whole article.
