Question about Kentmere 400

gb hill

Veteran
Local time
4:45 PM
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
5,947
Location
North Carolina
My local camera store stocked Arista Premium film & still has a few rolls of the EDU 100 left. It sure was nice to walk in a store in N.Carolina & be able to walk out the door with rolls of Arista Premium & EDU films, but now the Premium has dried up. The store has switched over to Kentmere which of course is made by Harmon as their now low budget B&W film so I bought 10 rolls.

I never shot this film & will be expermenting with HC-110, RO-9, & D-76. How well does this film scan? & would like to read your experience. Exp. date is June 2018 so this must be a really fresh batch.
 
Greg, if I can believe the file names I used, the following are all developed in HC110B, some pushed to 1600. - Randy

P.S. All scanned with a Canon 9000, not the highest-end device

@ 1600:
7157798354_da396ff1ee_z.jpg


@400
8556595340_f29191c180_z.jpg


@400
8555484337_93afb129d1_z.jpg


@400
8555483947_339e1ba730_z.jpg


@1600
7157799016_4201d02e94_z.jpg
 
Sorry, I was developing roll of Fomapan 400, done now 🙂

I went through 90 feet of it Kentmere 400. To me it was best at ISO200 and I was using x-tol.
Not problems to scan. No problems to wet print.
 
It's a nice film, comes somehow grainy in Rodinal and quite nice in xtol. Dries completly flat and has good consistant Ilford quality.
I recently started to use Rollei RPX400 as my main film in HC110 and I love it. Many people believe it's either the same as Kentmere or quite similar to it. In my opinion it's not the same, but it could be my change to HC110 that gives me better results, I still want to test some K400 against RPX400; same scene, same exposure, same development to confirm it (but it's true that both films use the same base).

For HC110 i'm using those times with really nice fine grained results:
http://www.maco-photo.de/files/images/TA_RPX_400_gb.pdf
Could be a starting point for developing Kentmere400.
 
i use kentmere quite a fair bit. i soup them in various solutions, hc110, tmax dev and infosol 3.... recently i took the leap and used them for a photoshoot. I won't comment on the graininess as I tend to overdevelop it in higher temp, resulting in more textures.

here are some samples of the kentmere in the last 2 weeks, from a variety of camera/lens and developers used.

raytoei
 

Attachments

  • zraw-roll-3b-kentmerea400-sl2-elmarit-AA007-Edit-2.jpg
    zraw-roll-3b-kentmerea400-sl2-elmarit-AA007-Edit-2.jpg
    55.4 KB · Views: 0
  • roll-1-kentmere800-cl-40f2-AA001-Edit-Edit-Edit.jpg
    roll-1-kentmere800-cl-40f2-AA001-Edit-Edit-Edit.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 0
  • zraw-roll-4-kentmere-various-AA006-Edit.jpg
    zraw-roll-4-kentmere-various-AA006-Edit.jpg
    54.4 KB · Views: 0
Randy, Those examples @ 1600 look nice. Good to see how well this film pushes as I'm shooting my last rolls of neopan 1600.

Ko Fe thank you & no problem Yes I'll be scaning this film mainly to post to the great www but want to start wet printing as the temps are starting to warm up a bit.

Filz, Let us know how your test come out.

Philip, Do you use Dil.B? Photo looks good & times seem spot on. I'm liking the grain I'm seeing from the examples you all posted. I think this will be my go to 400 film as long as it's available to me. Thanks for all your post thus far.
 
some of my Kentmere400 examples

in Rodinal 1+25; shot at 400
03.jpg



in xtol 1+1 & rodinal 1+100, shot at 400
bobobokeh.jpg


pushed to 800 in xtol (i think stock or 1+1, don't remember)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

the last two are RPX400 (shot at 400) in HC110 B for 5 minutes... but as I said, I don't guarantee that it's the same film 🙄 I'll post my test results as soon as I can shoot them (I've got no K400 left at the moment)
japandinger.jpg


12.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom