Warren T.
Well-known
Hi Folks,
I have an opportunity to shoot an indoor family portrait at the home of a friend. There will be 10 people in the picture. I plan to use electronic flash of some sort (I have not decided the exact configuration yet).
I am thinking of dragging out my medium format gear for this session, but I have not kept up with the latest developments on MF color print films.
I was wondering which film you would suggest for this purpose. I was thinking of using Kodak 160NC. What do you think?
Is there a noticeable difference in grain or anything else between 400NC and 160NC?
I will, of course, try it out beforehand, but I wanted to get some input from folks who have shot these films recently for some ideas
.
Thanks!
Warren
I have an opportunity to shoot an indoor family portrait at the home of a friend. There will be 10 people in the picture. I plan to use electronic flash of some sort (I have not decided the exact configuration yet).
I am thinking of dragging out my medium format gear for this session, but I have not kept up with the latest developments on MF color print films.
I was wondering which film you would suggest for this purpose. I was thinking of using Kodak 160NC. What do you think?
Is there a noticeable difference in grain or anything else between 400NC and 160NC?
I will, of course, try it out beforehand, but I wanted to get some input from folks who have shot these films recently for some ideas
Thanks!
Warren
P C Headland
Well-known
Can't help with the Kodak films, but I use Fuji Reala (ISO100) and NP400H. Both are excellent films, Reala being a great landscape film. NP400H is a great multi-purpose film, with little visible grain.
The 400 speed films would give you a little more flexibility with lighting, although if your flash sync is slow (1/30 or slower), you may be better served by the slower speed film.
I don't think you can go too far wrong with any of the MF print films, they are all pretty good. In the end it will be pure personal preference & availability.
The 400 speed films would give you a little more flexibility with lighting, although if your flash sync is slow (1/30 or slower), you may be better served by the slower speed film.
I don't think you can go too far wrong with any of the MF print films, they are all pretty good. In the end it will be pure personal preference & availability.
Toby
On the alert
The killer if you're shooting MF will be the depth of field. How many people are you shooting and in how many rows? What type of flash? If you have a couple of rows of people and are shooting with battery flash guns you'll have to use a fast film -maybe fuji 800 print film to get f11 or f16 which will give you half a chance of getting everyone sharp in frame. I don't have any experience with portra being something of a monochrome or slide user, but to be honest I don't think there's a bad film in fuji or kodak's pro film line up these days.
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
An indoor portrait would suggest to me the 400NC - which I meter at 250. It's a nice film - grain is very tight, especially since you're starting with a big neg.
patrickth
Newbie
Warren T. said:Hi Folks,
I have an opportunity to shoot an indoor family portrait at the home of a friend. There will be 10 people in the picture. I plan to use electronic flash of some sort (I have not decided the exact configuration yet).
I am thinking of dragging out my medium format gear for this session, but I have not kept up with the latest developments on MF color print films.
If I were going into the unknown like that with my Mamiya RB Pro S, I would probably be bringing some tri-x. If its good enough for Annie Leibovitz and her Mamiya, its certainly good enough for me.
You can always carry more film for a security blanket.
She does most of her work with that camera if I recall. l
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
I too would vote for 400 speed. With a large negative, grain (and the Portra 400 is very fine-grained) is not an issue.
For flash, I hope you're using some sort of diffusion, e.g. bounce, umbrealla, etc. Direct flash for a group portrait is ugly, IMO. My preferred method is to bounce off ceilings and walls, but that presumes those surfaces are a neutral colour. Most ceilings are white, so it's usually easy enough. This presumes you have enough flash power, or more than one unit, stands, etc. I have a couple of Rollei E36-RE units. At 400, bouncing one of those off a ceiling is quite sufficient unless the ceiling is very high.
For flash, I hope you're using some sort of diffusion, e.g. bounce, umbrealla, etc. Direct flash for a group portrait is ugly, IMO. My preferred method is to bounce off ceilings and walls, but that presumes those surfaces are a neutral colour. Most ceilings are white, so it's usually easy enough. This presumes you have enough flash power, or more than one unit, stands, etc. I have a couple of Rollei E36-RE units. At 400, bouncing one of those off a ceiling is quite sufficient unless the ceiling is very high.
Warren T.
Well-known
Thanks for all the great input and advice! 
I really appreciate it.
Happy New Year!
--Warren
I really appreciate it.
Happy New Year!
--Warren
Share: