giulioz
Member
Is anyone using the Tri-Elmar on the R-D1? If so, what is your experience? I was using one on the M6 but then I sold it when I moved to digital. The lens was very convenient and an excellent performer. Overtime, I would add a Noctilux for low light shots and possibly a 21 asph for wider shots (ouch!) and I would be set also for when the MD arrives.
Thanks, Giulio
Thanks, Giulio
Ed Schwartzreic
Well-known
I tend to use the Tri-Elmar (1st version) as my "outdoor" lens for the R-D1 for subjects where I know I need to have this flexibility. I shot an outdoor wedding with in a little over a month ago and it was very satisfactory. Likewise I had a trip with friends to an outdoor museum, and again it was all I needed. Again, it is an ideal lens for the R-D1 and flash, wehere the f/4 maximum aperture is not an issue.
That said, the lens I use most is the old 35/1.4 for its small size and lower contrast level. For available light shots it's this, or the Noctilux. If I need something longer, the 90AA is my current choice.
Since I only have the 21/2.3 SA and the 12 CV, I am eagerly awaiting the new 21/2.8 Biogon.
Attached image is with the Tri-Elmar at 50mm, ISO 200, 1/125 at f/11, raw file converted to monochrome with Convert to B&W Pro.
That said, the lens I use most is the old 35/1.4 for its small size and lower contrast level. For available light shots it's this, or the Noctilux. If I need something longer, the 90AA is my current choice.
Since I only have the 21/2.3 SA and the 12 CV, I am eagerly awaiting the new 21/2.8 Biogon.
Attached image is with the Tri-Elmar at 50mm, ISO 200, 1/125 at f/11, raw file converted to monochrome with Convert to B&W Pro.
giulioz
Member
Thanks Ed!
Giulio
Giulio
DanielT
Member
I am using Tri-Elmar (1st version) as out-door lens, and I am totally satisfied
In low light conditions I use Summicron 35 mm f/2
Daniel
In low light conditions I use Summicron 35 mm f/2
Daniel
KEH
Well-known
I have the new Tri-Elmar and love it as a travel lens. A bit big and heavy, but lovely results if there is enough light. Example link:
http://www.pbase.com/kirkh/image/40368782
Cheers,
Kirk
http://www.pbase.com/kirkh/image/40368782
Cheers,
Kirk
T
tlianza
Guest
RD-1 Tri-elmar
RD-1 Tri-elmar
This combination works quite well. The f4 is a little limited at times, but the performance of the tri-elmar is excellent. I find that I typically use the 21mm F/4 CV lens with the finder most often on the camera. I have quite a few lenses in Leica mount and these two are the most common ones that I use on the RD-1 . I find that I still carry this camera eventhough I have a Nikon d2x as well. The Nikon image quality is a bit better and the zooms are certainly useful, but the weight and bulk makes the DSLR very difficult to bring along. One thing that I've noticed with the tri-elmar is that the longer focal lengths force you to step back quite a bit. I find that problematic when shooting in the city or in crowds. That's why that 21mm is always in the bag.
RD-1 Tri-elmar
This combination works quite well. The f4 is a little limited at times, but the performance of the tri-elmar is excellent. I find that I typically use the 21mm F/4 CV lens with the finder most often on the camera. I have quite a few lenses in Leica mount and these two are the most common ones that I use on the RD-1 . I find that I still carry this camera eventhough I have a Nikon d2x as well. The Nikon image quality is a bit better and the zooms are certainly useful, but the weight and bulk makes the DSLR very difficult to bring along. One thing that I've noticed with the tri-elmar is that the longer focal lengths force you to step back quite a bit. I find that problematic when shooting in the city or in crowds. That's why that 21mm is always in the bag.