Sorry, you have lost me completely here. You are blaming Leica for exactly what?
They built a digital camera, that from the point of file quality,is as good as any Canon ot Nikon top model, put it in a body that is less obsolescence-prone that a gimmicky DSLR body and put it on the market at a price ranging from similar to 4000$ cheaper than cameras in the same class and now you are telling us that the problem is that the body is too good?? 😕 😕
Compare the price difference between an M7 and M8 to that of a Canon 1V and a 1DSiii. You'lll find that the Leica body comes at rather a bargain.
If fact, imo this is the first Leica that does not come with a red-dot premium.
Quite apart from the fact that we need a spectacular breakthrough in sensor theory to get something that improves significantly on current sensors (that goes for all high-end digital cameras) we are rapidly approaching the level where technology can only improve beyond the point where it stops making sense in terms of end results, i.e. the photograph itself or the capability of optics. We are limited by the laws of optics, we are limited biologically.