Real Leica I Basement discovery or Zorki fake?

[krötenblender]

Hello

Question to the experts: a colleague yesterday came to me and gave the camera below for free. He had cleaned his basement and found it somewhere in the darkest edge and thought, he'd give it to me instead of throwing it away. Nice to have such colleagues and nice to be known as camera freak... 😀

The camera is not in real good shape (shutter curtain is ripped off from one side, but the mechanics seem to work), but may be it would be fun to restore it and bring it back to life.

If it would be a real Leica, it would be a Leica I from 1928 according to the serial number. But I suspect it being a russian copy (Fed, Zorki?) because the Elmar has printed 50mm instead of 5cm on it and because of some other things.

But since I am no expert for such an old Leica, I am not sure and would like to get your opinion.

The images of the camera can be seen here in original resolution and the first three of them below in the tiny uploads:

http://mempool.net/galleries/misc/leica_zorki/lz1.jpg
http://mempool.net/galleries/misc/leica_zorki/lz2.jpg
http://mempool.net/galleries/misc/leica_zorki/lz3.jpg
http://mempool.net/galleries/misc/leica_zorki/lz4.jpg
http://mempool.net/galleries/misc/leica_zorki/lz5.jpg

Thanks for all your comments.

 

[jsrockit]

I believe it is fake.

 

[karlori]

I'd go with fake also... Check this link
http://www.portretteur.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86

 

[xayraa33]

Fake, it looks to be a Fed 1 camera.

 

[chrishayton]

Its certainly a fake, sorry to say, the shutter release surround and the viewfinder window are the main give aways I can see from the photos.

 

[CameraQuest]

well,
its a real fake.

Stephen

 

[Paul T.]

The VF window surround is always the easiest to spot sign on these, I reckon - it's squarer, and reaches up to the top face, unlike the original.

But if you didn't spot that, the case on which someone has - with expert craftsmanship - sanded off the cyrillic logo is a pretty good warning sign!

 

[FrankS]

Yes, it's a real fake. Leica's do not have shutter buttons threaded for cable release.

 

[HuubL]

definite fake

 

[greyelm]

Another giveaway are the four chrome screw heads on the front.

 

[dotur]

It is undoubtedly a fake.

 

[karlori]

Another giveaway are the four chrome screw heads on the front.

I've seen black ones on also... Best bet to check if fake are the threaded shutter release and the rf cam imho.

 

[reagan]

Ah yes, yet another Russian beauty in disguise, hoping to attract a wealthy suitor. But the sacred yak hair string used to repair the stitching on her case has betrayed her - a dead giveaway. The jig is up and she's tossed out with the rubbish.

 

[krötenblender]

Thanks for the answers. That is, what I thought anyway.

But no, it is not "hoping to attract a wealthy suitor". As I said, it was gift from a colleague, and I don't intend to sell it. May be just a little bit of cleaning and then it goes into the shelf just looking good. If it had been a Leica, I would have tried to fix the shutter.

In any case, it was a very nice gesture, to give it to me.

 

[Pastor Chris]

I like the stitching on the top of the case. . . like Frankenstein, or the Russian fake equivalent.

Indeed a nice gesture.

 

[gb hill]

One thing for sure is that it's a real camera capable of taking some good photos so worth repairing.

 

[johannielscom]

I'd go with fake also... Check this link
http://www.portretteur.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86

That is by far the best website to find info like this😀😀😀😀

Thanks Karlori!

 

[colyn]

While this is a fake it is if in good working order a surprisingly good camera.

I've had a couple of Fed's with the Industar lens that took very good images..

 

[reagan]

"But no, it is not "hoping to attract a wealthy suitor". As I said, it was gift from a colleague, and I don't intend to sell it."

Totally my bad, krotenblender. I did not intend to insinuate at all that you were trying to fake a Leica to make some dough. I understood it was a gift to you.

I was talking / joking about the many [rather talented IMHO] craftsmen that spend a lot of time and energy to turn a pretty darn good and fairly lucrative Russian camera into a fake that will sell for a few extra bucks then probably sit on a shelf. No doubt, there's a market for 'em, but I still don't get it.

In any case, if in your shoes, I would spend a few bucks on it, get the shutter replaced, clean it up and enjoy using it. Judging from the "trimless body" it's a very early model, and in FSUdom, "older is better" and smoother. The fact that it was a thoughtful gift would make it even more enjoyable.

And again, my apologies for not making my pun clearer.

Edit: Scratch that "trimless body" comment. I've learned all FED.1's are such, unlike Zorki.1's.

 

[farlymac]

Best thing about that camera is it was free from a friend. The next best thing is it's not as expensive to get repaired. The third best thing is you can get some wonderful FSU glass to use on it. Go ahead, get it repaired, and shoot the daylights out of it. And get it recovered with some jazzy snake skin while you're at it.

PF