brusby
Well-known
I've generally had good luck buying things on Ebay, but only recently started trying to pick up a few basic, older Leica lenses to be used on a new M9.
Within the past few months I bought a black 50mm summicron and a version 2 50mm summilux. Both were represented as being in great working condition. Unfortunately, focus was way off on both. They both looked great and showed no signs of abuse, but the real clue was infinity focus was pretty fuzzy.
I'd read all the horror stories about new M9s having the sensor misplaced and of course I suspect that with mine. But, a chrome 50mm summilux I had was spot on, and so was a 90 tele elmarit, 90 summilux and a couple of wide angle lenses. So, what was the culprit?
I finally decided to send both lenses to Don at DAG. The first diagnosis came about a month ago for the 50 cron -- misplaced internal element(s). Price to fix was reasonable and the lens came back in great shape.
The 50 lux was disgnosed shortly after -- "focus was off due to loose internal lens elements". I got it back today. Focus perfect.
So, it seems the M9 is fine. Can't believe anyone would intentionally misrepresent lenses like that. Well, maybe I can . . . unfortunately.
So, caveat emptor.
Within the past few months I bought a black 50mm summicron and a version 2 50mm summilux. Both were represented as being in great working condition. Unfortunately, focus was way off on both. They both looked great and showed no signs of abuse, but the real clue was infinity focus was pretty fuzzy.
I'd read all the horror stories about new M9s having the sensor misplaced and of course I suspect that with mine. But, a chrome 50mm summilux I had was spot on, and so was a 90 tele elmarit, 90 summilux and a couple of wide angle lenses. So, what was the culprit?
I finally decided to send both lenses to Don at DAG. The first diagnosis came about a month ago for the 50 cron -- misplaced internal element(s). Price to fix was reasonable and the lens came back in great shape.
The 50 lux was disgnosed shortly after -- "focus was off due to loose internal lens elements". I got it back today. Focus perfect.
So, it seems the M9 is fine. Can't believe anyone would intentionally misrepresent lenses like that. Well, maybe I can . . . unfortunately.
So, caveat emptor.