Recommend a shop for LENS repair?

jlw

Rangefinder camera pedant
Local time
2:00 AM
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
3,261
I've just bought an LTM mount 135/2.8 Komura lens from another RFF member.

As he warned me, this particular example has dreadful performance at large apertures, and still rather lousy performance even at small ones -- it barely forms an image at all! I couldn't believe that Komura would let such a turkey get out the door deliberately, so I took a very close look at it.

I'm now convinced it has a tipped element. Looking down into the barrel, I can see chipped paint and other possible signs of impact damage, and one of the elements in the rear group looks as if it might be sitting slightly cockeyed.

As further evidence -- You know how you can hold a magnifier (or another lens) at the back of a lens to look through it by eye, like a telescope? The magnifier "eyepiece" forms a nice, bright aerial image for your eye... usually. Well, in the case of this Komura, the aerial image looks terrible with the magnifier straight behind the lens -- but if I hold the magnifier off at a 20-degree angle in one particular direction, the image cleans up tremendously. That's another reason I think one of the elements is tilted in the barrel.

Anyway, to make my usual long story a bit shorter: the seller graciously expressed his willingness to take it back (thanks, Paul!!) but since it would be very useful if it worked correctly, I'd like to hang onto it and see if I can get it rehabbed.

It would have to be at a reasonable cost, though -- while this lens seems to be uncommon, it's not super-valuable, and it wouldn't make sense for me to spend hundreds of dollars to have it put right. So, I don't want to send it off to (for example) John Van Stelten of Focal Point -- he does beautiful work and can fix anything, but it would be pricey, and I'm not sure he even works on "off-brand" optics.

So, can anyone recommend a more plebian U.S. repair shop that might at least be willing to take a look at it and either advise me, "Yeah, we can fix it for X dollars" or "Forget it, it's beyond economical repair"?


[I'd almost be willing to tackle it myself if it weren't for the fiendishly complicated rangefinder coupling, which consists of two differentially-pitched helical threads -- I can all too easily imagine myself taking that apart and then never finding the one of innumerable possible start-position combinations that would get it correctly back together again!]
 
JLW: How deep in is the lens? The interior element should be held in with a retaining ring, or be held in by sections of the lens screwing into each other with "just the right" space for the elements. It's possible that it got knocked out at the edges. I love how the Nikkor 13.5cm F3.5 just breaks down into sections. The Komura 200mm F4.5 looks like it would break down easily. I picked up a soligor zoom in a thrift store one time with a reversed element. For $15, it became a successful DIY job.

I suspect Essex will run ~$80. They do fine jobs of cleaning haze off of my Summarits, and I've not had a problem with bad alignment etc. They also did a great job on a Nikkor 105mm F2.5 that was stored in its styrofoam container which outgassed. Every surface was hazed over.
 
Essex are good, I have used them too. jlw if you can tell us where you are located maybe someone here can point you to a local resource.

 
My 135/2.8 Komura lens just came back from Essex. I haven't had a chance to do anything with it other than look through it with a groundglass and magnifier, and shoot a few test photos with the R-D 1 -- but it's evident that whatever was wrong in there, they fixed it. Before I sent it off, it couldn't form a sharp image at all; now, it seems nice and crisp. Basically, for $80 + shipping, they turned a paperweight into a usable lens. I'm happy.

I've already found out that focusing a 135/2.8 lens on an RF camera is a very critical business! Now we know why Leica put those weird magnifying goggles on the 135/2.8 Tele-Elmarit. I suspect the Komura will be a lot happier on my Canon VI-T (with rangefinder magnifier) or 7s than on the Epson or Bessa R3a.

I've also learned that when using an accessory viewfinder with a 135mm lens, you have to remember to set the parallax compensation dial! With a lot of shorter lenses, you often can get away with being casual about this; with the 135, skipping this step can lead to a clean miss!

Guess that's why so many wusses back in the '50s switches to those @#$% SLRs...

Here's a quick demo pic with the R-D 1 for anyone interested. The 'komura-full' file shows the entire frame, for reference; the 'komura-detail' file was cropped out of the center section, between the phone wires. Exposure was 1/125 @ f/2.8. I forgot to take a comparison shot with another lens before the sun went down, but this is looking pretty good to me.
 
Century Optics is another good resource to bookmark. They have been a mainstay to the Hollywood film business and can do just about anything you ever need (and do it right). Mount conversions are one specialty of theirs. Surprisingly their prices are reasonable.
 
I have used the Komura 200mm F4.5 with the Vt, using the RF spot on the "RF" setting for framing. Worked pretty good. Komura really pushed the envelope for RF's.
 
Brian Sweeney said:
I have used the Komura 200mm F4.5 with the Vt, using the RF spot on the "RF" setting for framing. Worked pretty good. Komura really pushed the envelope for RF's.


so using my Komura 400mm is not a great idea?
 
Is it in direct mounting RF Mount? Nikon made a 500mm and 1000m lens for the S-Mount, but they used the Viso-Flex. The longest lens that RF coupled was the Nikkor 13.5cm F3.5. Zeiss made an 18.5cm F6.3 for the Contax. The Komura 200mm F4.5 is RF coupled, and as far as I know, is the Longest focal length RF Coupled lens for LTM. The Schneider 200mm F4.8 will mount on a Retina IIIs, but does not RF couple.

I know they made a 400mm for SLR's, and it would not surprise me if you can get a T-Mount to LTM adapter for it. Probably talking Scale-Focus.
 
Back
Top Bottom