filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
The current iMacs are basically a closed system.
No CD/DVD and Apple now has to add any new memory.
If you can find a 2012 iMac, that's a great way to go.
On the plus side for the iMac's you get 4 chips to the Mac Mini's 2 chips. So if you have to do a lot of processing (mainly video work) then going with the iMac is the way to go. Otherwise you should be fine mac mini
No CD/DVD and Apple now has to add any new memory.
If you can find a 2012 iMac, that's a great way to go.
On the plus side for the iMac's you get 4 chips to the Mac Mini's 2 chips. So if you have to do a lot of processing (mainly video work) then going with the iMac is the way to go. Otherwise you should be fine mac mini
I am in the process o replace my 6 years old i.mac 24 (matt screen, 3 G RAM). A few days ago I had to replace to HD (no problem thanks to multiple back up!) and took the opportunity to discuss the options with an apple technician, tired to wait for a new mac pro (if there will be any?!) having to decide between a new i.mac (27 + so much ram as possible) or the mac mini. His answer was no i.mac but go for the mini (plus a thunderbolt raid hd) for sure or eventually buy a still available mac pro.
Later a met a friend of mine, passionate photographer and he told me to be very satisfied with his i.mac 27. Even without calibration colors on prints are very good.
Personally I'm leaning towards the mini...but not yet sure!
robert