Mika
Member
Who can show me pictures captured with one of those two RF ?
Interested to buy both of them but I'm curious and want to taste them before
The Revue because it seems to be a "clone" of the Minolta 7S II ? But cheaper...
The Ricoh because,... I don't know...
The Canonet 28 because it was the RF of my father,... and just want to have the same one.
Thanks.
Interested to buy both of them but I'm curious and want to taste them before
The Revue because it seems to be a "clone" of the Minolta 7S II ? But cheaper...
The Ricoh because,... I don't know...
The Canonet 28 because it was the RF of my father,... and just want to have the same one.
Thanks.
thmk
Well-known
Not my best but the only ones I could find taken with the Revue 400 SE and not photoshopped:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1093484
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1117561
Cheers
Thomas-Michael
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1093484
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1117561
Cheers
Thomas-Michael
mac_wt
Cameras are like bunnies
I own both. I don't use them often, but both are nice cameras. The Canonet 28 has a more solid feel to it, but the Revue 400SE has the superior lens. The color shot was made with the Canonet, the B+W shot with the Revue. Both are rather cheap carry-in-your-pocket cameras.
Wim (also from Belgium)
Wim (also from Belgium)
Mika
Member
Thanks a lot.
Thomas-Michael, I saw both of them on Photosig ;-) nice to meet you here.
Hi Wim, thanks for your pictures, "cheap carry-in-your-pocket cameras" that's exactly what I like in those cameras. These are better "bloc notes" than every digital compact,... to my eyes of course.
Thomas-Michael, I saw both of them on Photosig ;-) nice to meet you here.
Hi Wim, thanks for your pictures, "cheap carry-in-your-pocket cameras" that's exactly what I like in those cameras. These are better "bloc notes" than every digital compact,... to my eyes of course.
simonankor
Registered Addict
I started on a Ricoh 500GX, but I just lent it to someone so I can't go shoot something with it for you.
I'll see if I can't find some of the old negs from it and get one scanned.
it's a fantastic camera. The meter (at least in mine) is dead on. Lens is good and sharp with very pleasant contrast and it has as very quiet shutter.
I'll see if I can't find some of the old negs from it and get one scanned.
it's a fantastic camera. The meter (at least in mine) is dead on. Lens is good and sharp with very pleasant contrast and it has as very quiet shutter.
lubitel
Well-known
Revue 400se is very nice. Dont know the others. You need the 675 battery, or equivalent.
the scans are not of very good quality, but may be they help anyway.
the scans are not of very good quality, but may be they help anyway.
zuikologist
.........................
I like the Revue 400 SE (aka Vivitar 35ES) very much. Excellent lens, shutter priority and no manual control. I like it more than the Ricoh 500ME I owned.
chenick
Nick's my name!
I have a Canonet 28, which I rarely use as I generally take something with more control (an Olympus (35SP or XA) or my Yashica GTN)
But the Canonet is small, has a fairly sharp lens, has exposure lock. and is very easy to use.
Here is a pic from a test roll with expired supermarket film (expired several years)
Canonet test shot
-Nick
But the Canonet is small, has a fairly sharp lens, has exposure lock. and is very easy to use.
Here is a pic from a test roll with expired supermarket film (expired several years)
Canonet test shot
-Nick
Last edited:
S
sychan
Guest
Sample from Vivitar 35ES
Sample from Vivitar 35ES
I've read that the Vivitar 35ES is the same camera as the Revue 400SE. I put a test roll through the 35ES I picked up off EBay, and am very happy with the results. It seems really sharp with the prints from a short roll of XP2. I think this is going to become my new "carry everywhere" camera.
Sample from Vivitar 35ES
I've read that the Vivitar 35ES is the same camera as the Revue 400SE. I put a test roll through the 35ES I picked up off EBay, and am very happy with the results. It seems really sharp with the prints from a short roll of XP2. I think this is going to become my new "carry everywhere" camera.
R
Rob
Guest
The vivitar 35es was my first 35mm camera I owned. In the time I had it I only got a couple sharp pictures with it. Maybe mine was a dud or back then I was not using it very well. At that time I could not wait to get an SLR since everyone else seemed to have Canon AE-1s.
Dean
Established
I have the Vivitar 35ES and I am very happy with it. "Matt" has a review and 1 pic on his site.
http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/vivitar_35es.html
Erik Fiss ( site is mostly in German ) also has some photonet links and pics.
http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/vivitar_35es.html
I agree with the general opinion that is an excellent RF camera.
Dean
http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/vivitar_35es.html
Erik Fiss ( site is mostly in German ) also has some photonet links and pics.
http://homepage.mac.com/mattdenton/photo/cameras/vivitar_35es.html
I agree with the general opinion that is an excellent RF camera.
Dean
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.