RF645 100mm on photo.net
- Thread starter sf
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 23
- Views 2K
VictorM.
Well-known
$1000???!!!
Dougg
Seasoned Member
Yeah, the lens was made in low quantities and is hard to find (right, George?), and I've seen 'em go as high as $1400 (last June 23) on eBay. I got mine almost 4 years ago new from Adorama at $439 after the $50 rebate. Maybe now would be a good time to "take my profit" and run with the money?VictorM. said:
sf
Veteran
Dougg said:
Yes. Hard to find. Very. I got Clarence here on RFF to find me one in England. Thanks, Clarence. I LOVE the 100mm. It was worth every dime.
sf
Veteran
ChrisPlatt said:
Doug and I saw one go for $1400 and change last year. They regularly go for over $1000 on the auction site, and I have NEVER seen a more beautifully performing lens. It is worth the dough because of its performance alone...many would surely pay $1000 for some exotic Leica 75mm or 90mm lens. But, you add how rare the lens is, and that value increases.
I think that fact that the lens is a unique performer is what does it for me. I can't get the same look from any other piece of glass. Closest I have seen is the 75mm heliar, but that's the wrong format, and the 100mm is alot smoother.
clarence
ダメ
I really was glad to help. And I'm even more satisfied that you like the lens so much, George.
Clarence
Clarence
Pablito
coco frío
The method behind the ad seems a little sleazy to me. Set a price or run it as a bona-fide auction. Either would be fine, but this muddled middle ground reeks of greed and exploitation. Oh, I'm probably overreacting...
sf
Veteran
Pablito said:
funny thing is, I think this is the guy that bought the 100mm out from under my hesitant self last year. The lens is in LN- condition, I remember seeing it. Probably NEW by our standards. The price was ... less than $1000.
RObert Budding
D'oh!
It is a stunning lens. Perfect for environmental portraits. But the focus isn't close enough for tight head shots (but I find those a bit boring myself).
sf
Veteran
RObert Budding said:
I got it to focus pretty close - .7 meters approx., but still that is not close enough for tight headshots.
How many rangefinder users shoot tight headshots, anyway? Zero.
beethamd
Unix-like
If the lens was in the UK I may have thought about buying it. Taxes etc...
sf
Veteran
beethamd said:
right, yeah. I paid $65 to the US Government to import mine. 😡
beethamd
Unix-like
You see - If I'd bought the one in London and you bought the one over there... oh well.
sf
Veteran
beethamd said:
You could send me $1000 and I can buy it for you and ship it as a worthless piece of glass...but that wouldn't work too well, I'd guess. And I don't trust the post at all.
beethamd
Unix-like
How much did you pay for your lens? About £400? When I saw your lens advertised I nearly bought it - but for some reason I didin't. The same with Bessas - don't know why I haven't bought one yet - or the Ikon.
Worthless piece of glass? Did you write and delete that a few times?
Worthless piece of glass? Did you write and delete that a few times?
sf
Veteran
beethamd said:
Hey, it;s 4am here. My brain is oozing out through my eyes.
I paid $650 for mine. I think that was it. + 50 GBP shipping. So, I guess that comes to $730 or something, then add the $65 the US Government stole from me, and that makes it close to $800. Worth it. Really worth it. But if I had bought the 100mm that this guy in Photo.net bought, I would have paid only $450. I almost bought it but chickened out and let it sit for a few hours - in which time he bought it. I am assuming this is the same lens. May not be.
I wouldn't buy a Bessa again. Or the Ikon - not by a long shot. It just doesn't get good reviews for quality. For that kind of money, I'd surely buy a used M6 first. Or M3 and lens. I owned an R3A and it took good pictures, but I had to send it in to be replaced when I first received it because it had horrible alignment problems. The replacement wasn't perfect either. I lie, though. I would buy the Bessa L and 15mm heliar if one comes around again here on RFF.
Yes, I thought about not even writing that phrase inside the same field as mentioning the 100mm, but whatever. I was thinking I could buy it and send it to you, but there is no way you'd want to send such a pricey treasure through the post without accurate insurance. No way at all.
Goodnight.
beethamd
Unix-like
George - The gesture was appreciated. Pricey treasure - that's better. Much better. Now - get to sleep!
jtm
not a moose
You guys are killing me! I've been just about ready to convince myself that I don't use my RF645 (with all three lenses) enough to justify keeping it, and then you have to come in a gush about how wonderful that 100mm lens is. I don't think I could sell my 100 for $1000, though, since I paid $399 (just happened to look at the B&H or Adorama used listing at the right time, I guess).
The frustrating thing is that I would use the camera a lot more if I could scan the film myself. Aparently, I could sell the whole kit for $2000, which would buy a decent scanner. But without the camera, I wouldn't need the scanner. Rats.
The frustrating thing is that I would use the camera a lot more if I could scan the film myself. Aparently, I could sell the whole kit for $2000, which would buy a decent scanner. But without the camera, I wouldn't need the scanner. Rats.
erikhaugsby
killer of threads
ChrisPlatt said:
What mount was it in?
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
erikhaugsby said:
LTM. Too short for portraits in any mount...
Chris
Similar threads
