manfromh
I'm not there
Im very interested in submitting a few photos. I just have to get high-quality scans. My scanner isnt up to the task.
jan normandale
Film is the other way
Chris thanks for bumping this thread.
I'm going to scan three images and send them to you. You can put them in a folder until the logistics are figured out. When all that is determined ie number of players, number of images per player etc I'll cull one or two of the three depending on the final form for the volume.
Again, Todd has some good points for the "process" and I'd add one myself. I think that as in previous RFF books 'elegible' cameras should be RF's, folders or TLR's not DSLR's or SLR's since it's a Rangefinder Forum book. I'd like to get other members of RFF's views on this.
I'm going to scan three images and send them to you. You can put them in a folder until the logistics are figured out. When all that is determined ie number of players, number of images per player etc I'll cull one or two of the three depending on the final form for the volume.
Again, Todd has some good points for the "process" and I'd add one myself. I think that as in previous RFF books 'elegible' cameras should be RF's, folders or TLR's not DSLR's or SLR's since it's a Rangefinder Forum book. I'd like to get other members of RFF's views on this.
Last edited:
I'd agree with the RF's, folders, TLR's only approach, no SLR and DSLR, even though that kill's one of my favorites. I would also add I like the idea of keeping the tech stuff out, just title or location, and short bio, only if space permits. Keep it simple, but then if done right, it will also be elegant.
OurManInTangier
An Undesirable
I think that as in previous RFF books 'elegible' cameras should be RF's, folders or TLR's not DSLR's or SLR's since it's a Rangefinder Forum book. I'd like to get other members of RFF's views on this.
I'd agree with that. As everyone here is a Rangefinder user of some sort all images should have been shot using a Rangefinder. I'm not saying images should be of a certain type/style/subject but the very thread that brings people together here is the type of camera they use. Otherwise its a bit silly to have an RFF book, it would just be a book.
I didn't see Paul's comment before I typed my own....
paulfitz76 said:I'd agree with the RF's, folders, TLR's only approach, no SLR and DSLR, even though that kill's one of my favorites. I would also add I like the idea of keeping the tech stuff out, just title or location, and short bio, only if space permits. Keep it simple, but then if done right, it will also be elegant.
...but I agree with it entirely, including the absence of technical information. Let's make it about the pictures with the only technical stipulation being its shot on RF's, Folders & TLR's.
Last edited:
manfromh
I'm not there
Perhaps a new thread should be started (or this one moved) in Members Only section. I think more people would see it there.
And are TLR photos okay too?
And are TLR photos okay too?
Share: