RFF 'statistics'...

[physiognomy]

I came across this site on another forum... Plugged in RFF and out popped some rather interesting 'statistics'... I was personally surprised there are not more addicts 🙂

http://www.quantcast.com/rangefinderforum.com

Peter

 

[Jocko]

That was very interesting Peter! So.... most of us are male, poor, old, college-educated, childless and of undefinable ethnicity.

Someone has been looking through my window 🙁

Cheers Ian 🙂

 

[physiognomy]

That was very interesting Peter! So.... most of us are male, poor, old, college-educated, childless and of undefinable ethnicity.

Someone has been looking through my window 🙁

Cheers Ian 🙂

lol... I laughed at those figures too! Obviously I wouldn't put much weight behind any of their data, but figured it was worth sharing.

Peter

 

[Jocko]

At least they didn't mention "bald". At that point I would have started checking under the bed 🙂

Cheers, Ian

 

[HuubL]

This is the best part:
"We have sparse data about rangefinderforum.com, so these are rough estimates. You can correct them"

 

[ywenz]

that site is a joke.. doing a search on dvxuser.com pulls up:

This site that reaches approximately 11,601 U.S. monthly uniques. The site caters to a 18-34 crowd, largely male audience. The site's visitors' interests are auto info (The Auto Channel, Edmunds, Yahoo Autos, Auto Trader), political (salon.com, washingtonpost.com) and magazines (PC World).

 

[Dr. Strangelove]

I tried kenrockwell.com:

http://www.quantcast.com/kenrockwell.com

I especially like the "Ethnicity" demographics... The others might be in the right ballpark, although the 65+ age group is probably overestimated.

 

[dmr]

Uh, how in the heck are they supposed to be pulling those demographics?

 

[Sparrow]

I think Mark Twain said

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as much as you please.

 

[Pherdinand]

yeah... but hotornot dot com is number 286!!! 🙄
how can we beat that?