I just viewed the prints, and I'm glad I did.
It seems that some prints were printed in the 60's but most were printed in the 70's. The sizes and possiblely cropping were different than at the show at the MET. Definitely a different look to the prints, not so soft and low contrast, and definately more modern look on most.
The show at the MET I believe were more unified because they were all older prints and framed all the same as I remember. This exhibit was less so with some prints borderless and others with. The shot of through the screen door has a lot more clarity and the interior less abstracted. Many of the shots seem to have more contrast than I remembered from the MET.
Anyways it was interesting to see and compare how printing evolved over the decades. I highly recommend seeing this exhibit, especially if you saw the show at the MET. Although much of the same show, a very different experience.
Cal