Rolleiflex 3.5E: Wow and Double Wow

roscoetuff

Well-known
Local time
7:31 AM
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
534
Location
Washington DC
After trying Rolleiflex SLX and 6008 and loving the output and flexibility of an SLR in medium format but not really liking the weight, bulk, etc. for everyday MF carry, I've tried 2 folders and a TLR. The folder works for portability that I can slip into my briefcase and carry to work, but it lacks a bit in sharpness - actually by design... and leaving it at "a bit" understates the softness. While it can be a feature for portraits, it's not a first choice to leave a photographer at the mercy of his landscape. So I went back and re-read some of the advice received before swinging for a folder and decided to take a plunge on a Bay II TLR. Don't ask me why... it just happened.

Received on Monday and since then I've shot a bunch of TMY-2 and despite what some would have you believe about 3.5E Xenotars, the negs now running through the scanner are some of the sharpest I can recall. The camera is absolutely no slouch... even if it's something my grandpa might have run before I was born I like what it's producing. So yeah... I get it now.

I love the way you can get low angle shots without having to lie down as you would for an SLR without a WLF by just bending low, and I've been totally impressed with Rollei's integrated accessories - especially the bayonet filters and quick release tripod mount. These things ain't cheap, but for the most part, they seem really well thought out and integrated into the design concept of the TLR.

There was a time I really wondered about the slow speed of some MF lenses, but without a rotating mirror, slow exposures come out very sharp anyway. And the shutter is absolutely one of the quietest I've ever shot. (Bronica SQ series has one of the loudest btw). And the whole package is lighter by half and smaller by good measure than a Bronica SQ, or the Rolleiflex SLX and 6008 series cameras... which are all amazing and problematically challenged at the same time in their own right.

But wow. I am absolutely won over with this crazy two-eyed monster. Now as they say, "I get it". Together with the upgrade to a new, tiny Sekonic 308 meter, what an improvement! Some of the best B&W I've managed so far in this "return to film" adventure over the last 14 months. Developed on a Jobo in Ilford ID-11 1:1, it's a real sweet combo. Highly recommended to anyone on the fence about these crazy cameras. The gear packs up small and you can have everything you need and the "system" is capable of producing in a fairly small bag. What it lacks in traditional SLR cool design and flexibility it makes up for in simplicity... and it's Art Decco lines have a "look" of their own that already has attracted more attention than I'd expected.

So at least for now, the Mamiya 6 RF envy is over, and I'm having a lot of fun just letting the camera lead me where it will. While there's really no cheap way into the Rollei empire, the denizens seem a happy group... even here amongst the (patrician) collectors who make the lives of us more plebian shooters relatively expensive. And yes, I will be sending this puppy out for a tune-up now that I'm convinced it'll be worth the fare.
 
Glad you like it. I think TLRs just appeal to some people. I felt that way about the Yashica MAT 124G I had, but strangely enough, I never liked the Rolleiflex with the good Schneider-Kreuznach lens I had. Partly I don't know why, and partly I think because I had a Mamiya Super Press 23 by then.

As to the old folders, if you get a good one I think you will be surprised at the lens quality. But you never know what an old folder may have been through in life. I have several Welta folders, 35mm and 6x6. Fortunately mine are good. I have a Zeiss 6x9 folder with Novar lens that is unbelievably sharp.

But no matter. If you like that Rolleiflex, enjoy it to the max. TLRs can for sure be fun to use.
 
Grab yourself some Bay II Rolleinars. You'll be able to focus close, and there appears to be no image degradation. Rolleinars come in a set (viewing and taking lenses); the viewing lens corrects for parallax.

Rolleinar I on a 124G:
med_U27021I1463578249.SEQ.0.jpg


Rolleinar III (aspect ratio crop only):
med_U27021I1521297325.SEQ.2.jpg
 
Lynn: Got the Rolleinar # 1 and have a # 2 on order. I see there's a # 3, but don't see a lot of clamor for that. Nice shots btw.

Rolleipol: Worth picking up, or better to get a good Bay _ adaptor and polarizing lens separately? So far, I've picked up the yellow and orange Bay II filters - which are kind of my standard B&W go-to's.
 
I'm also just now realising the appeal of TLRs. I've used a bunch of folders and had a Pentacon Six that died on me, so I went for a Yashica 635 (for the lens).

The first time I took it out, I hated it. Focusing screen flare, handling I wasn't used to etc.

But I've shot 5 rolls with it now and I love it. Better results than with any folder or the P6, and I'm starting to really enjoy the handling.
 
That's what I thought when I received my 2.8C Xenotar, I did have to replace the
bellow's inside which I did but when I got the scans back wow (I just said the same thing).
 
They are great fun, and with the leaf shutter they can sync with a flash at any speed. A basic manual flash and cheap radio triggers will open up all sorts of possibilities, esp since you already have the Sekonic 308.
 
Received on Monday and since then I've shot a bunch of TMY-2 and despite what some would have you believe about 3.5E Xenotars, the negs now running through the scanner are some of the sharpest I can recall. The camera is absolutely no slouch... even if it's something my grandpa might have run before I was born I like what it's producing. So yeah... I get it now.

I'm not sure what you've read... but the 75/3.5 Xenotar in my 3.5F is probably the sharpest lens I've used... and that list includes both the Rolleiflex and Hasselblad Planars... 🙂
 
There's a lot to learn in terms of getting the most out of it. But for a one-lens guy (most of the time), the zoom-with-your-feet thing works, and the camera just inspires some creative thinking. What the camera may lack in lens versatility, it seems to make up in other ways and function as a great tool for making images.

Love seeing these images! Thanks!
 
I think for portraits... the sharpness may be a hang up. Am getting a soft focus filter so my wife won't have a fit when I snap her. Maybe her only neg is being negged about having her photo snapped. Dunno why... as a two-year-old once said, "Her beautiful". Cameras should have my eyes 😉
 
Soft focus options

Soft focus options

Rolleiflexes have very sharp lenses, whether Schneider or Zeiss.
For those looking for soft focus adapters, Rollei did make their own, called the Rolleisoft. It comes in different strengths. 0 and 1, with 0 having the weaker effect.

There are earlier versions that Rollei called the "Duto" filter.
Apparently, the name has carried on as a generic label for the soft focus filters that have concentric rings on the glass.

If the genuine Rollei filters are too expensive, then Hoya makes a DUTO filter in 43mm size. I use it on a Bay 2 to 43mm thread adapter.
 
The Xenotar and the Planar are sharp, with great tonality, great everything. You can't tell them apart except for colour rendition. The Xenotar is cooler, the Planar is warmer (Zeiss colour). I've been using the Mamiya c330 with various lenses. Fine. Then I grabbed my Rolleiflex - smaller, lighter, compact, tight, smooth, luxurious. Just the best.

Enjoy your camera, I understand what you mean. You cannot go wrong with a Rolleiflex.

4525141429_f4f2c916c6_o.jpg

Kodak Ektar 100

5104655408_97f7d4ea59_b.jpg

Fuji Acros 100

33540504683_80db0f8781_c.jpg

Velvia 100F
 
Back
Top Bottom