itf
itchy trigger finger
I can guarantee you would be OK with this photo, morally and legally, in the UK at least, as long as you don't caption it "millionaire food mogul takes his son Bernie for a walk outside their luxurious home, 49 Worachek, Bangkok"
My thinking was that it was legal (depending on the country) to use a photo with an identifiable subject in editorial work, even if that subject was under-age. However, it seems to be a pretty vague line between using a photo of a celebrity and their child and a photo of any other citizen and their child. How long before someone could be in court for a photo such as this?
It also seems that the UK judge is suggesting that the average person has the right to not have their child appear in an editorial photo, and some people here seem to agree.
Tough thing is I think many paps do go too far, and the situation heads down the stalking direction; a pity it can't be seen as that.
Anyway, as you can see, this kid was armed and so if he had objected I probably wouldn't be talking about it 😛.