S2 vs S3 finder

heliographer said:
Let's just call it like it is. Fine, you want an S2. I wish you luck/happiness with your decision (de gustibus non disputandum est). I had one. I hated it. The only things that were good about it were the wide rf base length and the reasonably high quality materials/manufacturing. But everything else about it--the discolored vf/rf, the stupid Contax focusing system, the horrible ergonomics, etc. made me regret the purchase. The only camera I regret buying more is the Minox 35 GL.

Is it really that much cheaper than a Voigtlander (or dare I say it, a Leica M/CL)?
Click to expand...

Hey - that was a long time since any Nikon RF-basher came in this sub-forum for the sake of just bashing what's this sub-forum is about.

Thanks :p
 
Highway 61 said:
Hey - that was a long time since any Nikon RF-basher came in this sub-forum for the sake of just bashing what's this sub-forum is about.

Thanks :p
Click to expand...

I didn't mean it as bashing. I love Nikon cameras AND RFs. I started on Fs, F2s, etc. and have F3s, and I've had a dozen or so RFs, mostly LTM or M Leicas. That's why I bought the darned thing, hoping the S2 was the peanut butter cup of cameras (not to mention it mounts some of the best lenses ever made). I just learned it wasn't for me. Seriously, more power to folks who love 'em.

I still don't know why one wouldn't get the Bessa R2S/C. Then you'd get the superior VF and ergonomics (but inferior RF and build quality). Right?
 
Highway 61 said:
@Erik van Straten

Sorry I got confused w/ removing the S3 / SP topcovers when I thought of the large ring securing the topcover to the chassis around the wind lever axle. This ring doesn't exist on the S2. Post edited.
Click to expand...

It is OK.
Thank you for the link!
In the meantime I received the S2 repair manual. Makes fascinating reading.
It seems that the front plate and the focussing mount can be removed as one piece quite easily. In that case however the leather covering has to be removed. I don't like that, but can the small prism be reached in that way too?

Erik.
 
Meanwhile, back to the OP's question: Does anyone else with glasses find that the 50mm framelines of the S3, though not 1:1, are pretty nice to use, too?
 
personally I wouldn't buy an S2 if I already owned an SP and/or an S3.

not that I don't think the S2 is an excellent camera. but I wear glasses, and I find the .72 finder on my M2 suits me a lot better than the S2 one.

personally if I were in the market for a Nikon RF it would be an S2, but that's more a budget thing. The S3 and SP are PRICEY.
 
Erik van Straten said:
It seems that the front plate and the focussing mount can be removed as one piece quite easily. In that case however the leather covering has to be removed. I don't like that, but can the small prism be reached in that way too?

Erik.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't go that way ! The leatherette will get torn out, and you will get serious focus register calibration problems ! Plus, the screws attaching the whole front panel to the chassis won't want to budge I reckon.

The best and only way to reach the RF prism is to remove the front plate and the top cover.

Removing the focusing helical by itself is very easy and this is a great opportunity to take it apart, clean its threads with solvent and 0000 steel wool, and slightly lubricate it with white lithium grease before reassembling so that you get a butter smooth focusing action.

There is a strong debate around about whether the focusing helical should be lubricated or not. Personally I like doing it, but other skilled people don't, so just read all the threads about this to make your own opinion.
 
The S2 is definitely an eyeglasses scratcher. The back of the eyefinder has a raised metal lip. My hands-down favorite camera is the S3 because I love the huge 1:1 wideangle finder that allows me to shoot 28mm lens without a secondary finder. However, that requires pressing the metal viewfinder up against my glasses. I no longer get paid to take pictures and it's just not worth it to me, so I stick with the SP and mini wide-angles.

I don't have the cameras out to compare, but I think the S2 sound is about as loud as a Nikon F, but a different kind of sound. Interestingly, I have found that my Titanium shutter cameras and my cloth shutter cameras (RF) are about the same noise-wise -- I have an old SP in which the shutter was replaced with Titanium, and the sound it really the same as my SP-2005.

On ergonomics, I completely understand. I had a nearly identical reaction when I picked up a Leica M-6. Almost every single aspect of the camera was just a big turnoff. The less-than-lifesize finder - hated it. Shutter button in wrong place. Lenses turn wrong. No way to hold lens still via the focus wheel. No way to shoot one-handed using the focus wheel. Really hate the automatic frameline indexing feature ... why can't I choose the lens? Why do I need to see an unrelated frameline along with the one the lens has selected? Guess I'd been using Nikon RFs too long before I checked out Leica.
 
A properly sized rubber gasket bought at the local plumbing store for 5c and glued around the eyepiece with three harmless glue spots will do it perfectly as for preserving the glasses.
 
Good advice on the eyeglass protection. I'd prefer a rubber gasket to a diopter. I need my eyeglasses too much so it's not at all ordinary to remove them.
 
after the great advice here, I orderered and finally received my S2, unexpectedly the Rangefinder patch is really much better visible than on the S3 almost on par with my SP, I guess the reflected framelines fo the S3 are the main difference, the S3 is slightly more prone to flare, because of the reflective coating on the eyepiece and the 3 lines which light up very prominently as soon as you work in mixed lightconditions. I guess my 50 will live on the S2 in the future, impressive for the age. nice uncluttered view, one simple 50 frame, the nice greenish tint helps for better contrast imo. where the S3 has a rather yellowish tint, but both are great and absolutely workable imo. the S3 is still the best choice for 35 imo.

for the sound, the S2 is louder than the S3/SP but not by much, i guess main reason is the turning dial action of the 2-phase time wheel, nowhere as lound as my F2 though. very, very nice I'm impressed
 
maitani said:
for the sound, the S2 is louder than the S3/SP but not by much, i guess main reason is the turning dial action of the 2-phase time wheel
Click to expand...

The sound of the S2 is caused by a device called "pendulum" wich is a kind of counterweight to the shutter wich acts as a brake.

However, I've never seen a picture of this pendulum and I've never read an explanation of how it works.

Erik.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom