ColSebastianMoran
( IRL Richard Karash )
I see some dust problems above.
Yes what's being done with the Carousel sans lens is interesting, to be honest, I wouldn't have thought of trying that but I was wondering how the results might compare with simply acquiring an image off a screen. It may well be superior. I only tried this once many years ago, the camera was four megapixels worth, and I used the front of my refrigerator as a screen. It worked, but I wouldn't draw any conclusions from my results, given the methodology definitely wasn't ideal! I managed to dislocate a kneecap rather badly recently, and then, because I wasn't smart enough to rest it, did it again. So now I am restricted for a bit until the swelling eases. Thanks for asking, kind of you. 🙂Must say, this method shows a lot of potential for mechanising the feeding of slides. Great idea, Colonel and Predicolous. I also fancy the suggestion of using the intervalometers on the projector and camera and staggering their action.
Brett,
The projector lens doesn't come into play. It's removed and you stick the camera lens right into the chamber.
Have you been laid low recently? too much carousing on New Year's Eve?
...I would rather use a stronger light source and keep faster shutter speeds at f/8 or similar
Another idea: try the light source a pakon F235 uses - i know it’s halogen but don’t remember which.
Won't the substitution of a cooler light source result in colour temperature and gamut complications? The colour of those old slides shown above looks gorgeous by the way.
How would the results from photographing the projected image on a flat screen compare with what you've done so far?
The projector lens doesn't come into play. It's removed and you stick the camera lens right into the chamber.
Here's an example, food prep at a beach party 1970, shade but direct sun in background. This is a Kodachrome slide. 10MPx from this 12MPx camera. I think this is pretty good.
Love this out of the box thinking. How hard is it to ensure planarity between the sensor and the slide?
Brett, us antipodeans must look after each other. Sorry to hear of your misfortune. Very painful.
I believe taking a photo of a projected slide was once a serious way of slide duplication. It might even have been done for copying movie film or transferring from film to video. I might have even tried it myself once. In any case the copy would be a 3rd generation image.
Thank you guys, you are kind.Yes, I've heard of this, and I think I've done it in a pinch.
Might work, but I'm not going to go that route; I prefer a compact setup rather than one in which I have to darken the room.
Hope you're feeling better!
I'm watching developments with great interest. I have many slides I wish to convert, and 2 Kodak Carousel projectors - 1 basically for parts (about worn out but complete) and 1 in E.C.
I suspect (hope??) the "parts" one may qualify for modification.
Thanks for your efforts.
David