Semi-OT: DSLRs similar to RFs?

Coming late to this thread...

It's interesting, as this was something I was thinking on at the weekend.

It was the purchase of a 300D that got me back into photography a little while after it was released. As such I shall never regret that purchase. But since then I have been captured by rangefinders, well and truly. RFs are my go to gear, although I have plenty of different systems to choose from (manual K-mount, Pen F, Bronnie SQ-A as well as the EOS and Leica-mount). In a tool-for-the-job sense it's RF or SLR, with the choice of SLR being down to my mood.

For example, I like shoot a lot of gigs and it's the DSLR for colour low-light performance (Neat Image is great, and surprisingly effective), and it also gets grabbed for macro. I shoot for a friend's firework company, and that takes the DSLR every time.

Everything else, usually film and usually RF.

But, use of RFs has changed my approach to the DSLR. These days I use it almost exclusively on manual - and once I got to know it, I find manual use of the 300D to be quite comfortable. Except for focussing - VF is too small and dim, and the screen just isn't made for it. Also I have moved to almost all primes (the only zoom I have for it now is the kit lens). And I'm using more M42 glass - I think I remember reading somewhere about a hack to the adapter that can re-awaken focus confirmation. Must look again for that.

And at the weekend I shot a gig with my M2 and CV 75. Took the Canon along also, but didn't take it out of the bag until I shot my two rolls of film. After a couple of frames scanned, I think I prefer what I got on film! But that was a very close-up shoot. I wouldn't want to try a bigger venue with it.
 
Going totally OT

Going totally OT

Except for focussing - VF is too small and dim, and the screen just isn't made for it.


There is a neat little trick for that: I believe the 300D has an internal diopter correction.
Get a (cheap) 2x external diopter and screw it to the ocular. The viewfinder will be out of focus, but enlarged 1.4 times. Then use the internal diopter-correction to -2.
That will restore the sharpness witout affecting the magnification of the viewfinder.
 
Last edited:
Hmm. Might give that a shot. Cheers.

And I tracked down the adapter thing - it was a reference on Karen Nakamura's site about a couple of guys taking the electronics from a cheap lens and fitting it to an adapter.

/wanders off looking for a really cheap EF lens.
 
I'll second Bill's nomination of the Pentax as being very pleasant to use, especially with old prime lenses. It fits my hands well, great viewfind, has enough weight to feel solid but not tiring, and fairly quiet for an slr. With a 35mm prime ( x 1.5 crop factor makes it similar to a 50) its fairly compact too.
 
"And I'm using more M42 glass - I think I remember reading somewhere about a hack to the adapter that can re-awaken focus confirmation. Must look again for that."

OT - Goodyear that would be useful to know if you can find the link (and the hack is not too drastic!)
 
jaapv said:
There is a neat little trick for that: I believe the 300D has an internal diopter correction.
Get a (cheap) 2x external diopter and screw it to the ocular. The viewfinder will be out of focus, but enlarged 1.4 times. Then use the internal diopter-correction to -2.
That will restore the sharpness witout affecting the magnification of the viewfinder.

That's a really nice trick... I'm definitely going have to try this. Thanks!
 
Back
Top Bottom