Bill Pierce
Well-known
A friend recently asked me about the difference between APS-c and full frame digital cameras. They were expecting me to talk about image quality, I think they were surprised when I said that the big differences were that APS-c cameras were cheaper and smaller. Yes, all other things being equal (and they often are not) full frame will have a slight edge in noise level, brightness range and detail. But, with today’s technology, that difference is not overwhelming and you have to work carefully to take advantage of it. So, yes, price and size are to me the big differences for most people.
And to the those wealthy amongst us at the RF Forum to whom price is unimportant, small is not just convenient for street, travel and family photography. It means the long lenses of the sports and wildlife worlds don’t have to be quite so long, and macro shots of the wealthy’s rare coin collections will have a little more depth-of-field.
Are there shots where that slight improvement in technical quality afforded by full frame are important? Of course, and it’s not just limited to the oft mentioned landscape, architectural and extreme low light photography. It’s whatever you think should be technically the best you can achieve.
But, as you know, you are going to have to work to gain the quality afforded by the larger sensor. That can mean a high shutter speed or tripod, a very good lens used at an optimum aperture, accurate focus - all-in-all a slower, more methodical photography, not so different from the changes film photographers make as they move to larger formats.
So what sensor size do you use and, by far, more important, why?
And to the those wealthy amongst us at the RF Forum to whom price is unimportant, small is not just convenient for street, travel and family photography. It means the long lenses of the sports and wildlife worlds don’t have to be quite so long, and macro shots of the wealthy’s rare coin collections will have a little more depth-of-field.
Are there shots where that slight improvement in technical quality afforded by full frame are important? Of course, and it’s not just limited to the oft mentioned landscape, architectural and extreme low light photography. It’s whatever you think should be technically the best you can achieve.
But, as you know, you are going to have to work to gain the quality afforded by the larger sensor. That can mean a high shutter speed or tripod, a very good lens used at an optimum aperture, accurate focus - all-in-all a slower, more methodical photography, not so different from the changes film photographers make as they move to larger formats.
So what sensor size do you use and, by far, more important, why?
