alexandru_voicu
Established
Hi everyone,
I am the proud owner of a Amedeo Contax to Leica M adapter and I just gave it a first try with a 1982 Helios-103 lens. Everything went smooth on my Zeiss Ikon body, but, after I developed the first roll, I noticed a slight front focus wide open (3cm at 1m). Right now I'm contemplating shimming the Helios-103 to correct this. At this point, I can see it done in two ways:
1. Reduce the main shim that sets the distance between the lens mount and the optical block; or
2. Increase the internal shim between the rear optical block and the front block, thus moving the rear block closer to the film (and, in effect, increasing the focal length of the lens).
I haven't disassembled the lens, so everything I'm writing here is theoretical. The main disadvantage of method 1 is that I'll have to drill new holes for the grubs, given that the entire optical block will find itself in a different position in relation to the lens mount. Therefore, my question is, what do you think of the second method? Will it accomplish what I am after? As a plus, the second method will be easily reversible.
Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Alex
I am the proud owner of a Amedeo Contax to Leica M adapter and I just gave it a first try with a 1982 Helios-103 lens. Everything went smooth on my Zeiss Ikon body, but, after I developed the first roll, I noticed a slight front focus wide open (3cm at 1m). Right now I'm contemplating shimming the Helios-103 to correct this. At this point, I can see it done in two ways:
1. Reduce the main shim that sets the distance between the lens mount and the optical block; or
2. Increase the internal shim between the rear optical block and the front block, thus moving the rear block closer to the film (and, in effect, increasing the focal length of the lens).
I haven't disassembled the lens, so everything I'm writing here is theoretical. The main disadvantage of method 1 is that I'll have to drill new holes for the grubs, given that the entire optical block will find itself in a different position in relation to the lens mount. Therefore, my question is, what do you think of the second method? Will it accomplish what I am after? As a plus, the second method will be easily reversible.
Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Alex